I believe the club have come.down hard on information leaks previously
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] Where is Moises going? (Chelsea - 14/08/2023)
- Thread starter Bozza
- Start date
I mean RDZ literally said he will leave this summer before the season had even finished !
Everyone gets it. Your guess is no better than anybody else's.
Some of us just believe that Bloom won't sell unless the price is met, that's all. Put it this way: if the best offer we get is the £70m we've already been offered, I don't believe we'll sell. If we are offered £70m up front and £15-20m in add-ons, he'll go.
With Rice > Arsenal and Mount > Man Utd now pretty much done deals, I’m not so sure either of those clubs will still be in the market for Moises.
My gut is that it’s now Chelsea or nothing. And certainly there’s no ‘bidding war’ between the three, if ever there was. So once Chelsea match a figure Tony is ok with, he’s off.
Having gone for and then backed out of Rice so they are clearly looking for another CM, I am amazed City are not in for Caicedo.
The only reason I can think is that different to Chelsea and United, they are good negotiators. They have limits and are very sensible about the price they play for players. They know we can and will drive a hard bargain and they would probably have to pay more than they think he's worth to get him so don't want to get involved.
The only reason I can think is that different to Chelsea and United, they are good negotiators. They have limits and are very sensible about the price they play for players. They know we can and will drive a hard bargain and they would probably have to pay more than they think he's worth to get him so don't want to get involved.
I understand people who were hoping for a bidding war BUT Chelsea have lost Kante, Mount and Kovacic they are absolutely desperate now for a new central midfielder, the fans are getting very twitchy. They really need Caicedo now and that means we can set a real premium price.
How much? I would want £60 million + Colwill + extras, but I would prefer that he stays.
I would value Caicedo at more than that.
Last edited:
dejavuatbtn
Well-known member
Why would we have to?
Keep the lad happy as clearly he's only interested in the wonga
£60m + Colwill on loan + achievable bonuses of about 20?
Uhm, remove Colwill and I'm sure the board would happily snap your hand off for that deal
Weststander
Well-known member
Mount often plays in around the striker. Caicedo is imho a totally different type of player.
He’s far better than his equivalents of McTominay and Fred.
warmleyseagull
Well-known member
£75m + add ons according to this: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/sport/foo...p&cvid=98c6a09098ae4b329278d9b40700437d&ei=10.
Probably BS; I would be surprised if Colwill is not part of the deal.
Probably BS; I would be surprised if Colwill is not part of the deal.
According to all reports we are looking to pay around £80m and will probably max out at £90m
You have no hope of Colwill being included tho, so it's best that you kill that dream
Long contract could be 10 years, or 4 times the length of Trossard career left. MORE £
Cheeky Monkey
Well-known member
- Jul 17, 2003
- 23,884
Colwill's comment on RDZ kills that one: "I'm happy to have worked under him"
To be honest Colwill has a long way to go in his development, great on the ball but more work required defensively IMO. Think if things go pear shaped, he’ll fall out of favour.
Would take £90m plus add-ons. Caicedo is way ahead of Rice, but not English.
Edit - reading The Athletic, apparently Colwill in talks with Chelsea around future.
Last edited: