Oh look .... The same tweet repeated for about the 5th time today
This makes so much sense... The Athletic reporting Chelsea bid £60m for Caicedo a couple of weeks ago and the rumours of us upping our bid to £40m for Colwill to make up the £100 m we value Caicedo at!
Yes, give us Colwill and 60 million and you can have Moises.The Athletic seem sure that we’ve put a £100m+ on Caicedo. Chelsea either cough up the lot, give us Colwill & £60m or **** off.
Agree with you.Do we have to have this on every transfer thread?
Personal terms are regularly agreed before prices are. It doesn’t really matter and it makes sense as it stops clubs/players/agents wasting their time on a transfer that isn’t going to happen. It won’t stop as it’s in all clubs interest as they all do it, including ours.
Reckon it's essentially meant to say 'it's Colwill plus £60m, or £100m.I don't understand the logic there...
We reject a £60 million bid, then bid £40 million for Colwill, and that proves we value Caicedo at £100 million. Eh?
Doesn't it just prove we value Caicedo at more than £60 mil and Colwill at at least £40mil?
This makes so much sense... The Athletic reporting Chelsea bid £60m for Caicedo a couple of weeks ago and the rumours of us upping our bid to £40m for Colwill to make up the £100 m we value Caicedo at!