Interesting. Why won't it make a difference?Sales to Saudi Arabia won’t help them with FFP this year according to The Athletic. Which is good news for us (and United) maybe.
Interesting. Why won't it make a difference?Sales to Saudi Arabia won’t help them with FFP this year according to The Athletic. Which is good news for us (and United) maybe.
We had Mac then and now we don’t.He's gone. I don't think we'll play differently next season.
Btw we bossed Arsenal at The Emirates while he played at right back so it's not all doom and gloom
Manchester United
How much evidence do you need before you'll 'agree' that the club's model is to be a stepping-stone. To name just the most recent:The clubs model up until now has worked, but things change and the situation at the club has changed, of course we must continue what has worked in some way but keeping Moises should be our priority.
I disagree the clubs model is to be a stepping stone, we have always accepted being a stepping stone because we’ve never been in Europe, never finished in the top 6 teams in the country, and never had a squad full of this class of talent.
I fully accept the possibility of Moises going and I understand him going in a sense but I just don’t believe there is any positive in him leaving, he’s so so so good.
Baffling how some still haven’t worked this out………..How much evidence do you need before you'll 'agree' that the club's model is to be a stepping-stone. To name just the most recent:
Ali Mac, Tross, Biss, Cucu, Maupay, Ostigard, Burn.
Next up will be Moises. Will you accept it then?
It's positive in the sense that it demonstrates to emerging talent that we have a model, that we will play them young, that we have the most innovative coaching, the best facilities, and that we won't stand in their way when a substantially better (or, better, richer) offer comes to them, for the simple reason that other clubs have more money than us. We're competing against petro-states, and this is the way we do it.
Needs to be filed with "Why are they fannying around with it at the back - just GET RID!"Baffling how some still haven’t worked this out………..
No probably not £100m true enough. But they’ll happily offer more than they’re willing to offer for Mount. Mount only has 1 year left on his contract.If they don’t want to pay 55 million for Mount they are not going to pay 100 million for Moises
Are you saying Maupay stepped up? we got lucky Lampard hasn’t a clue what he’s doing.Baffling how some still haven’t worked this out………..
Are you saying Maupay stepped up? we got lucky Lampard hasn’t a clue what he’s doing.
We're absolutely fooked if we don't play differently next season.He's gone. I don't think we'll play differently next season.
Btw we bossed Arsenal at The Emirates while he played at right back so it's not all doom and gloom
Lighten up fella
It doesn’t really matter when Chelsea buy a player. If they paid 100m today, they’d only need to include 5 days’ worth of amortisation in the 2022-23 accounts.Is it possible that we will end up getting used in some messy ffp-maneuver where we pay an insane amount for Colwill at the end of june, and then Chelsea send the money back +a lot more in an even more insane deal a day or two after(in july)?