Arkwright
Arkwright
So is the likely eventuality going to be that it all goes through on the last day of the window and we don't end up with a replacement
Very painful stuff.Avoided thread for all of 12 hours and another 5 pages and 3 more rumours
Painful
Zero chance of that.So is the likely eventuality going to be that it all goes through on the last day of the window and we don't end up with a replacement
Well, I wouldnāt bet my house on him staying. Itās a fact heās unsettled, we know that much, otherwise heād be gearing up for Saturday. And weāre dealing with a suitor who chucks money about and has a new high profile manager to keep happy. So is it 51%-49% that theyāll find the money? Seems possible to me.What makes it more likely than not? Have I missed something?
Jacob Steinberg has consistently parroted the Chelsea line, Iād not noticed before they (Chelsea) started to move for our players. Iād take anything he writes with a large dose of Chelsea flavoured salt.Iād love the new Chelsea mouthpiece the Guardian to be wrong ā¦. that this will complete and Caicedo will start at the weekend.
Until now I thought all the broadsheets football sections were incredibly accurate on transfer news, very clearly separating that from a chatty relaying of rumours.
You donāt have to follow them. Itās possible to do a search with the #bhafc for news.For the first time Iām inclined to give in. I like facts. I must be the only nscāer who doesnāt follow Romano or Jacobs on twatter.
View attachment 164684
I'm not so sure, I can only see it going through if we get a loan replacement which isn't ideal.Zero chance of that.
We won't sell ( unless for astronomical sums - Ā£250 million ?) on deadline day if we don't have a prior-signed replacement.
He is extremely well connected and yes, he is usually pretty accurate. More of an expert on Spanish football, he appears on the Euro leagues 5 live programme. Looks to me that Moises is nearing the exit door. Real shame. (Hope he stays)Is Miguel Delaney trustworthy?
This article is fairly specific. Or is it just guesswork?
Other than saying Chelsea are trying to unsettle another young player by under bidding there is nothing in that article.Chelsea make Moises Caicedo breakthrough as Brighton talks continue
The Blues have seen multiple bids rejected by the Seagulls, with Mauricio Pochettino eager to add the Ecuadorian to bolster his midfieldwww.independent.co.uk
I always think the time clubs supposedly take to prepare a bid is tenuous At best. How long to sit down, agree an increase in purchase price, then send an email?Just ridiculous. Can't remember reading more than 10% of the articles I've read about this, about any other transfer ever, and there's not even a bidding war to justify the absurd amount of words. Its such a simple thing. If Chelsea stump up the clubs valuation he goes. They haven't so far, so he's staying, for now. All this fantasy "in negotiations/discussions/ inching closer/close to an agreement" is all utter BS. Wish all the word warriors would sod off and focus on something else
Especially as we've been continually told that personal terms are agreed.I always think the time clubs supposedly take to prepare a bid is tenuous At best. How long to sit down, agree an increase in purchase price, then send an email?
FFP has NO relevance. No one takes it seriously as anyone bending the rules will just cop a small fine. Essentially clubs like Chelsea can do what they want without restriction. No one in authority has the balls to deduct them points for FFP failures so the current behaviour will just continue.If chelsea have bid Ā£48m for the saints lad the Reds have been wasting their time on are they still going to be in for Moises? The pair would cost them Ā£150m plus wages etc and Shirley even they would struggle to justify that to FFP?
The Reds loss could be Brightonās gain unless cfc are forcing Liverpool to cough up the Ā£50m leaving them free to make the Ā£100m bidā¦.
Got to love this time of the year.
I blocked both of them, itās amazing how much it improved the experience and I wasnāt interested in either of them or their moronic sycophantsFor the first time Iām inclined to give in. I like facts. I must be the only nscāer who doesnāt follow Romano or Jacobs on twatter.
View attachment 164684
Another 40 million spent for Chelsea and I thought you could only have 22 in a squad ā¦is there a rule that Chelsea can have 222?
And a 7 year contract possible ext to 2030!!
Personally never heard of the player or his position
Edit
18 years old foward and played 9 (nine) senior games he also signed a new contract recently till 2026 now worth 40 million??
Problem is that they have clone / copycat accounts that just recite whatever nonsense they have written and flood the #bhafc, bloody annoyingI blocked both of them, itās amazing how much it improved the experience and I wasnāt interested in either of them or their moronic sycophants
When you take a part from a Ferrari engine and put it in a Ford Escort it does not really work. I think Ali Mac may be the exception.Iām not too bothered at this point, donāt want to jinx things, but like all our players who have moved to pastures new, they all have turned into a dud. The Grass isnāt always Greener.