Baldseagull
Well-known member
The Caicedo situation is different. He had 2.5 years left on his contract and can't run it down quite so easily, refusing him a January move is less risky than refusing a player with 18 months.There was no risk of him leaving in January though. We saw that with Caicedo.
Chelsea are in the very same situation with Mount.
They have asked for 70 million.
So why would we have a set 45 million when he's worth more than that amount given he's the same age, same contract and better than Mount is.
Chelsea can ask for what they like, but lets see what they get.
He is only worth more than £45M with 2 years on his contract, with 18 months left, as he would have had in January, that is probably about right. With 12 months as he would have had this coming window, about £30M tops, 6 months, less than £10M, and f*** all next summer.
You should be asking why he would sign a new contract just before the World Cup, when his hand was only going to get stronger? The reason appears to be that he had a clause that would not push the transfer fee required to get him up so much that a move became much less likely.
Or for free next Summer. Like Mount could, if Chelsea don't lower their expectations. They are gambling, they might win, but they have a weak hand and everyone knows it.Or he could have been going for 60 million. Like Mount could.