When will the UN do something ?

[alfredmizen]

The hypocrisy of the Americans is astounding when they cite UN resolutions

http://www.economist.com/news/middl...biggest-land-grab-generation-another-thousand

 

[symyjym]

It's probably because the UN understands that if the Jews didn't have Israel they would have no home at all.

If we remember the Turkish Muslims invading north Cyprus it displaced thousands of Greek Cyporiots. What did the Greek Cypriots do? They built their lives elsewhere on the island and got on with it. Palistinian Muslims would rather blame their continued misery on others instead of building their own country to a prosperous level.

When we look at the Islamic map it covers the whole of the Middle East, North Africa and is of great size in Asia. Israel is probably less than 1% of the Islamic land mass so it is not completely unfair considering it is their ancestral home.

 

[daveinprague]

'It's probably because the UN understands that if the Jews didn't have Israel they would have no home at all.'


Well, The Roman Catholics, dont have a 'home land', neither do Protestants, Buddists etc etc.
It is a faith, not a nationality. Israel is the 'nationality.' with many of them speaking with American, English, and East European accents.
A nation born out of Israeli terrorists, killing British servicemen and local residents.

As King Saud said, give them Bavaria.

 

[Triggaaar]

It's probably because the UN understands that if the Jews didn't have Israel they would have no home at all.

If we remember the Turkish Muslims invading north Cyprus it displaced thousands of Greek Cyporiots. What did the Greek Cypriots do? They built their lives elsewhere on the island and got on with it. Palistinian Muslims would rather blame their continued misery on others instead of building their own country to a prosperous level.

When we look at the Islamic map it covers the whole of the Middle East, North Africa and is of great size in Asia. Israel is probably less than 1% of the Islamic land mass so it is not completely unfair considering it is their ancestral home.

Please stick within the rules, you know very well that you're not allowed to side with Israel on anything.

 

[daveinprague]

Please stick within the rules, you know very well that you're not allowed to side with Israel on anything.

No matter how many crimes the Israeli State commits

 

[Triggaaar]

No matter how many crimes the Israeli State commits

Surely because of the crimes, rather than no matter how many?

 

[Insel affe]

When we look at the Islamic map it covers the whole of the Middle East, North Africa and is of great size in Asia. Israel is probably less than 1% of the Islamic land mass so it is not completely unfair considering it is their ancestral home.

Not the point at all...

About 4,000 years ago the ancestors of the Hebrews were wandering nomads (that means they had no land, get it) Biblical tradition says that Abraham, the founder of the line, came from Ur or Sumer some think. There are no records of these people except for the traditions laid down in the Bible many centuries later. The story says that Abraham entered Canaan briefly, and God promised him that his descendants would inherit the land ( that is rather handy don't ya think) This is the earliest mention of a claim which was to prove controversial right down to the present day. It is the religious basis of the tradition that Israel belongs to the Jewish people because it was promised to them by God. Of course a long string of other inhabitants, from the Canaanites and Philistines to the modern Arabs who call themselves "Palestinians," have disagreed.

According to your way of thinking we should set aside a strip of land in Britain for the 1% of people that worship the devil because one of their leaders told him the devil told him it was true.

 

[symyjym]

'It's probably because the UN understands that if the Jews didn't have Israel they would have no home at all.'


Well, The Roman Catholics, dont have a 'home land', neither do Protestants, Buddists etc etc.
It is a faith, not a nationality. Israel is the 'nationality.' with many of them speaking with American, English, and East European accents.
A nation born out of Israeli terrorists, killing British servicemen and local residents.

As King Saud said, give them Bavaria.

Islam considers the Temple Mount in Israel as their third most holy site with Mecca and Medina in Saudi preceding it. The Temple Mount the most holy site for Jews and Christians but the Jews actually built it.

Ultimately the land would either be Islamic or Jewish. If It was turned into an Islamic State would you argue against it as well? There aren’t three options on the table.

Let us not forget that historically Muhammad slaughtered thousands of Jews and enslaved thousands of others.

Have you ever heard of Mosab Hassan Yousef (Son of Hamas)?

https://youtu.be/KakxXN5Z-XI

There is lots of his stuff on youtube if you want to find out more.

 

[SeagullinExile]

Israel was bombed into existence in 1948, and has continually grabbed land ever since. - See the Stern Gang (Lehi) and others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehi_(group)

 

[symyjym]

Not the point at all...

About 4,000 years ago the ancestors of the Hebrews were wandering nomads (that means they had no land, get it) Biblical tradition says that Abraham, the founder of the line, came from Ur or Sumer some think. There are no records of these people except for the traditions laid down in the Bible many centuries later. The story says that Abraham entered Canaan briefly, and God promised him that his descendants would inherit the land ( that is rather handy don't ya think) This is the earliest mention of a claim which was to prove controversial right down to the present day. It is the religious basis of the tradition that Israel belongs to the Jewish people because it was promised to them by God. Of course a long string of other inhabitants, from the Canaanites and Philistines to the modern Arabs who call themselves "Palestinians," have disagreed.

According to your way of thinking we should set aside a strip of land in Britain for the 1% of people that worship the devil because one of their leaders told him the devil told him it was true.

We can only go back so far. There is no historical evidence for Abraham or Moses, although if we are to believe the Moses story he was a blood thirsty genocidal maniac who killed hundreds of non virgin females.

I see the official claim goes to who built the Temple Mount, that to me is solid proof of commitment to the area. It’s a massive structure that took decades to construct and rebuild, with tens of thousands of workers. The only reason why Islam claims the site as holy, is because Muhammad dreamt of going on a night Journey on a flying donkey to heaven via temple Mount from Mecca.

As I said in another post, it would either be Islamic of Jewish.

 

[symyjym]

Israel was bombed into existence in 1948, and has continually grabbed land ever since. - See the Stern Gang (Lehi) and others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehi_(group)

It's been going on since the fall of the Ottoman Empire when Britain took it over. We instigated a mapping out Israel, and King Faisal I think, signed it away in return for securing Arab land. This is basically a struggle between two religions over a holy site and if Islam wasn't like it is, then probably there would be no Jewish state of Israel, just a country called Israel.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

'It's probably because the UN understands that if the Jews didn't have Israel they would have no home at all.'


Well, The Roman Catholics, dont have a 'home land', neither do Protestants, Buddists etc etc.
It is a faith, not a nationality. Israel is the 'nationality.' with many of them speaking with American, English, and East European accents.
A nation born out of Israeli terrorists, killing British servicemen and local residents.

As King Saud said, give them Bavaria.

It's as if the Holocaust never happened. It was agreed after 1945, that the Jews would be given land to make a home and Jordan agreed. I'm not condoning any atrocities done in the name of Israel, but it isn't one sided. Of course, many Jewish people went there to help build a homeland, which is why there is such a mixture of nationalities.

A majority of them get on well together as shown by our own Hemed and Kayal. Politics gets in the way of ordinary people trying to live.

 

[Insel affe]

We can only go back so far. There is no historical evidence for Abraham or Moses, although if we are to believe the Moses story he was a blood thirsty genocidal maniac who killed hundreds of non virgin females.

I see the official claim goes to who built the Temple Mount, that to me is solid proof of commitment to the area. It’s a massive structure that took decades to construct and rebuild, with tens of thousands of workers. The only reason why Islam claims the site as holy, is because Muhammad dreamt of going on a night Journey on a flying donkey to heaven via temple Mount from Mecca.

As I said in another post, it would either be Islamic of Jewish.

Yep kinda agree with you although Islamic or Jewish are not a race of people either of them.

 

[Diego Napier]

It's probably because the UN understands that if the Jews didn't have Israel they would have no home at all.

If we remember the Turkish Muslims invading north Cyprus it displaced thousands of Greek Cyporiots. What did the Greek Cypriots do? They built their lives elsewhere on the island and got on with it. Palistinian Muslims would rather blame their continued misery on others instead of building their own country to a prosperous level.

When we look at the Islamic map it covers the whole of the Middle East, North Africa and is of great size in Asia. Israel is probably less than 1% of the Islamic land mass so it is not completely unfair considering it is their ancestral home.

They were given a home by the West on land appropriated from people who had no say in the matter. They've since chosen to invade other peoples land and take it as their own and stick 2 fingers up at the UN. A sort of rather more civilised IS.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

They were given a home by the West on land appropriated from people who had no say in the matter. They've since chosen to invade other peoples land and take it as their own and stick 2 fingers up at the UN. A sort of rather more civilised IS.

Jordan offered to make the Trans Jordan into Palestine. Quite a few of the people who 'had no say' stayed on and lived peaceably. Others like the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem caused a lot of trouble and conflict over it.

 

[symyjym]

Yep kinda agree with you although Islamic or Jewish are not a race of people either of them.

I meant Islamic or Jewish politically. A choice of Sharia or non Sharia.

Sharia is from the times of the Pact of Umar https://wikiislam.net/wiki/The_Pact_of_Umar

 

[smeg]

This is partly Britain's fault anyway because The UN partitioned Palestine under "Resolution 181 or the partitioning act" as it was called into Arab and Jewish states which ultimately started the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. up to 1947 it had been part of colonial Britain and it was a British and American committee which drew up the plans.

 

[Triggaaar]

The good news is, I'm sure that by the end of the thread we'll all reach a consensus.

 

[smeg]

The good news is, I'm sure that by the end of the thread we'll all reach a consensus.

After a sensible and well rounded debate

 

[BBassic]

I've honestly never understood the Israel / Palestine thing. I've done some reading but am still none the wiser. Is anyone able to give as much as an impartial breakdown of it as possible?