Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

When did Gary Hart become good again?



Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Reading posts from last night it seems most think OGH should have played.

Currie , not fully fit yet, has two bad games (maybe he did but I wasn't there so can't comment) but Hart has been off the pace and pretty useless for two seasons and last season was playing in a much inferior division and did close on nothing all season.

Last night, he would have made a difference?? Clutching at straws comes to mind

Patience never was a strong point with Albion fans but the hysteria about Currie not being up to it after two games is ridiculous. Paul Rogers got similar abuse when he first played I seem to remember :shootself
 




Trigger

Well-known member
Jul 4, 2003
40,457
Brighton
I'm not saying Hart is good again but he is fit, Currie isn't, it's a no brainer as to who should be playing really...
 


ILOVEBHA

Member
Jul 27, 2004
830
Shoreham By Sea
I agree with Icy Gull as Harty has been rubbish for two seasons now and obviouslly not been doing well in training so why pick him in place of Currie who needs matches to get his fitness back and when he does he should be a better prospect than hart.I like Gary but he should be just a squad player in this division.
 


Fourteenth Eye

Face for Radio
Jul 9, 2004
7,941
Brighton
yes but it was harty who almost single handedly carried the fight in the home play off against swindon. He lost his place that day & was fired up. It appears that he has lost his place now & he will want it back. A fired up & hungry OGH will always be in my team
 


trueblue

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
10,955
Hove
Harty's a good sub. Currie has the potential to create far more, and he won't be very likely to realise that potential unless people give him a chance. It's not his fault he's taken Hart's place.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here