- Jun 27, 2012
- 14,636
Paging [MENTION=24867]chaileyjem[/MENTION] are you going to be writing a strongly worded letter to the Argus for this article?
The Argus has decided not to allow its readers to comment on that article.
Paging [MENTION=24867]chaileyjem[/MENTION] are you going to be writing a strongly worded letter to the Argus for this article?
The Argus has decided not to allow its readers to comment on that article.
The Argus has published his full name which is now irrevocably stored in Google's index connected with committing a criminal offence. (Search for it now to see)
His name has never appeared on NSC either in connection with this nor at any time before.
The approach of one of these sites stands a good chance of hindering this young man's future prospects and I'll give you a clue: it's not NSC.
Having read his message (reproduced on page 11 ) if this is the average piece of grammatical work produced by a 17 year old in this country, then god help us. Irrespective of content, its appalling from start to finish. If he was hoping to present his case in a clear and lucid way, he failed miserably. Its a disjointed, poorly punctuated, misspelt ramble. I would be truly horrified if a 17 year old of mine produced this. What the hell is going on in the education system? Its basic stuff and he is a way off that mark.
Suggest he spends the next five years concentrating on improving his written communication skills, as he has no chance of impressing any employer based on that. I'm sure some on here will spring to his defence, claiming it was an emotional, off the chest response but even that cuts no slack with me. You are either capable of acceptable written English or you are not.