Firstly I am still slightly amazed every time I see the Amex - let alone go in it.
But ............. the design was rather foisted upon us at a time when it seemed too incredible to believe it could ever happen (fortunately lots of people have a lot more belief than me) but there was a NSC thread at the time when a poster said about the trend for retro stadiums in the States. That is a stadium that has the modern facilities but had the pitchside look of an old stadium with separate stands. I did rather like that idea. We could have had a two tier West Stand (full length this time) and a North Stand more like the Kop with a single tier etc.
I love the Amex - but I do sometimes think what other designs could we have looked at (safe in the knowledge that I will never have them money to fund it ................).
The design was Foistered on us? By whom?? KSS, American express, the FA, the League, the president of the United States.... whom? Pray tell!This is an award winning design generally praised for being more advanced thatn the "usual soul less bowl" design that most people are fobbed off with (MK Dons, Coventry, Leicester, reading etc etc) What a silly argument. It has to fit the space we were trying to fit it into.. and we do have seperate stands . Its just that we have filled in the gaps at the back.
I have stood ankle deep in people's piss at our National Stadium. I have no desire to go to anything that remoinds me of old fashioned out of date grounds that do not allow people to watch safely or in (relative) comfort
Last edited: