[Albion] What would have been a fair return from Palace, Chelsea and Leicester?

[GT49er]

Three. Beat Palace, but nothing expected from the other two (probably in line with Giraffe's tracker).

 

[pure_white]

Its great that we keep the unbeaten run going but we would've been 50% (points gain) better off losing to Leicester and beating Chelsea (or vice-versa). Without a doubt the 3 points for a win has made a huge difference to football....now if we still had 2 points for a win ...I wonder how much better off we would be in the league table?

 

[Neville's Breakfast]

No such thing as fairness in sport but I can easily see a scenario where we comfortably took 9 points from those games. Outplayed all three teams but couldn’t score.

 

[Sarisbury Seagull]

7.

On the balance of play over the 90 minutes in all three games I would say wins against Palace and Chelsea and a draw yesterday. All three superb and very enjoyable performances.

 

[zefarelly]

'Fair' is what we got.

I think we got what we deserved, good performances but no killer instinct.

should/could have had 6 or 7. . . then again not long ago it would have been bugger all.

 

[el punal]

10 points, cos we’re f***ing brilliant!

 

[rippleman]

No defeats given the absence of Dunk & Biss is a pretty good return I think.

Yes, we should have beaten palace because they were truly shocking but draws against Chelsea & away at Leicester are perhaps more than could be expected.

Are we Chelsea's bogey club now? Our women got an excellent draw yesterday against the reigning league champions, WFA Cup & League Cup holders and CL finalists

 

[Gonzo BHA]

9 / 7 points. We were the better team in each of the games. Having said that, a draw yesterday was probably just about a fair result.