Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

What has Zamora done to upset Chris???



B.W.

New member
Jul 5, 2003
13,666
So you would be happy if Zamora came on, played for 30-45mins and then was subbed? If so fair enough. But I can absolutely see why Hughton would not want to be guaranteed to burn a sub regardless of what is happening in the game so early.

Right. At last, a reasoned argument. Well, I saw NOTHING in Bobby's performance last night that said to me he was tiring / 'slightly injured', and so couldn't have lasted 60 minutes (as Hemed did).
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Eh!? Were you at the game? If so, did Bob look tired or 'slightly injured' at the end of the game to you?

Of course I was at the game. It's difficult to see the players leaving the pitch from the north stand but don't let that stand in the way of your opinion that everyone else is wrong, bar you.
 


B.W.

New member
Jul 5, 2003
13,666
It is sad how people revert to type so quickly using terms like lickers as some posters suggest that Hughton isn't lying that Zamora's not fit enough to start. I've missed the NSC of last season when people like you gloated about how right you were all season and how everyone should listen to you. Been pretty quiet this season but a couple of defeats and all the moaners are out again. Sad.

Noddy.

... and I was right, much to your annoyance...
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
It is sad how people revert to type so quickly using terms like lickers as some posters suggest that Hughton isn't lying that Zamora's not fit enough to start. I've missed the NSC of last season when people like you gloated about how right you were all season and how everyone should listen to you. Been pretty quiet this season but a couple of defeats and all the moaners are out again. Sad.

Using derogatory terms leads me to believe that it's just a wind up and loving an argument for the sake of it.
 


B.W.

New member
Jul 5, 2003
13,666
Of course I was at the game. It's difficult to see the players leaving the pitch from the north stand but don't let that stand in the way of your opinion that everyone else is wrong, bar you.

I think you'll find I'm not alone in this thread. There are many questioning Hughton's decision re Bobby starting or otherwise.

Fine impression of Wenger there BTW, with your 'didn't see it' response.
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
I think you'll find I'm not alone in this thread. There are many questioning Hughton's decision re Bobby starting or otherwise.

Fine impression of Wenger there BTW, with your 'didn't see it' response.

Bless.
 


B.W.

New member
Jul 5, 2003
13,666






Finchley Seagull

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2004
6,916
North London
Noddy.

... and I was right, much to your annoyance...

As I said sad. As for much to my annoyance re last season, if you're actually a fan rather than a wind up, it should be to your annoyance.

You were moaning the same this summer (as were many more) and it's gone okay so far. Sadly, I think some so called fans on here, including you, are actually looking for us to fail so they can moan on here and slate anyone who supports the team.
 








The red pepper kid

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2014
693
You have been OWNED. :wave:
crikey is it that important you have to pop at anyone that responds with a sensible reply, come on calm down and be honest ---he cant play every game and hes better paired with Wilson -who can do all the running , Hughton has been the best thing since Poyet--that is not in question (and if he makes a mistake) ???? are any of us in possession of all the facts---NO --and you don't know BETTER you just think you do
I appreciate we want him on the pitch but he came with us knowing hes fragile and must be treated so --we have had super subs in the past I don't understand why people cant accept that his his best role for us .
were all frustrated but I think feb onwards we will turn it back on the new guy settled in and hopefully bong and rosenior back -lua lua on song it will all look different
boro top (derby will blow it again) couldn't beat leeds - we did !,
carry on and CALM down
 


B.W.

New member
Jul 5, 2003
13,666
As I said sad. As for much to my annoyance re last season, if you're actually a fan rather than a wind up, it should be to your annoyance.

You were moaning the same this summer (as were many more) and it's gone okay so far. Sadly, I think some so called fans on here, including you, are actually looking for us to fail so they can moan on here and slate anyone who supports the team.

Actually, I applauded our signings this summer, although pointing out that Baldock wasn't good enough, so was hoping we would sign JC or similar (as the club clearly wanted to do).

Your post is so full of sh1t. You really need to get your facts straight.

And how dare you question my support for our team.

Pointing out an obvious selection error by our manager doesn't mean I am a poor supporter. I hope, one day, you can understand that.
 


B.W.

New member
Jul 5, 2003
13,666
Completely agree. Luckily most of his type have not been on here much this season. Apparently, they've just been waiting for a couple of defeats to return and slag off the team.

Another post that is full of sh1t. Show me where I have criticised the team. Go on, do your worst.

You've lost the argument again. Face it.
 




D

Deleted member 2719

Guest
It is sad how people revert to type so quickly using terms like lickers as some posters suggest that Hughton isn't lying that Zamora's not fit enough to start. I've missed the NSC of last season when people like you gloated about how right you were all season and how everyone should listen to you. Been pretty quiet this season but a couple of defeats and all the moaners are out again. Sad.

Have you ever thought that accurately aimed criticism of last season may just have inspired Chris Hughton and TB to prove the knockers.

Last nights refusal by CH was wrong even though poster on here will imply bobby MAY have an injury.

I call it MOTIVATION, if every fan licked everyone where would we be...................................an orgy???
 




B.W.

New member
Jul 5, 2003
13,666
crikey is it that important you have to pop at anyone that responds with a sensible reply, come on calm down and be honest ---he cant play every game and hes better paired with Wilson -who can do all the running , Hughton has been the best thing since Poyet--that is not in question (and if he makes a mistake) ???? are any of us in possession of all the facts---NO --and you don't know BETTER you just think you do
I appreciate we want him on the pitch but he came with us knowing hes fragile and must be treated so --we have had super subs in the past I don't understand why people cant accept that his his best role for us .
were all frustrated but I think feb onwards we will turn it back on the new guy settled in and hopefully bong and rosenior back -lua lua on song it will all look different
boro top (derby will blow it again) couldn't beat leeds - we did !,
carry on and CALM down

I genuinely believe that Bobby should have started. This was a vital game, and Hemed has been poor for months. Instead, through Hughton's mistake (IMHO, of course), we offered the initiative to Ipswich, and they took it,. We then ended up chasing they game, and being forced to bring on the players we should have started with.
 


Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,318
Back in Sussex
Murphy was standing in an off side position before the ball hit the crossbar, watch it again.

He wasn't.

The player wide right with Hemed was playing him on.

Murphy disallowed goal Ipswich.jpg
 




B.W.

New member
Jul 5, 2003
13,666




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here