Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

West Pier to be demolished



Jul 5, 2003
23,777
Polegate
Argus article

ENGINEERS are being called in to tear down the ghostly remains of the battered and burnt West Pier.

Owners of the beleaguered Victorian landmark in Brighton have finally decided to draft in a team of experts to remove the vast majority of the iconic structure which has become a hazardous scrapheap since an arson attack in 2003.

The grand old lady's famous concert hall and walkway will be torn down and all that will remain is the theatre at the furthest point out to sea which will stand like an island, cut off from the pier's old entrance which will also be left standing.

Dr Geoff Lockwood, chief executive of the West Pier Trust which owns the structure, said it was a necessary safety measure which would be financed by the planned Brighton Eye, a 600ft tower designed by the team behind the London Eye, which developers want to build at the foot of the pier.

He said: "We're looking at the best way of removing the wreckage. The idea is that we get it removed while we are building the Brighton Eye."

The trust is responsible for the cost of removing the wreckage and estimates it would cost up to £300,000. The trust will be negotiating with the architects of the Brighton Eye to determine who pays.

Dr Lockwood said: "No one's got that money and we want to raise that with the income stream from the Eye."

The charred ruins remain a Grade I listed building and English Heritage has to give its consent to tearing it down. A spokeswoman for the organisation said: "English Heritage is is proposing a meeting with the West Pier Trust, Brighton and Hove City Council and the engineer John Orrell to discuss the removal of the wreckage.

The trust hopes to rescue the pier's theatre and the entrance for possible restoration.

Once work has been agreed between English Heritage and the West Pier Trust, a planning application will be submitted to Brighton and Hove City Council.

Consultants Hemsley Orrell will plan and oversee the demolition. Tidal times will be critical to the removal operation. Engineers will have to cope with up to eight metres of water at high tide.

They will use a barge from Shoreham or Newhaven harbours to transport equipment and use a floating or jacked-up platform to work from.

Most of the removal will be done by cutting and lifting the metal from the sea with some of the piles being extracted.

The West Pier has a long and troubled history.

It first opened 140 years ago and remained popular for a century, attracted more than two million paying customers a year at one time.

It fell out of fashion and neglect led to its closure in 1975.

But many of the city's residents still have a romantic affection for the structure.

Kirsty Edwards, 31, a teacher, of Lambourne Road, Brighton, said: "I just think it's sad. It's the end of an era.

I can understand it's dangerous but if they had sorted things out sooner it may not have come to this."

But conservation group The Regency Society welcomed the move for health and safety reasons.

Chairman Roger Hinton said: "The sooner the wreckage of the concert hall goes the better. Our view has always been that it is not safe so we welcome this move."

Sad news:nono:
 






Jul 5, 2003
23,777
Polegate
chicken run said:
Why is it sad, if it pisses the Regency socierty off then brilliant.

Well personally, even though it's in a state, i still enjoy looking between the two piers - and the old one is still a landmark of sorts.
 


dougdeep

New member
May 9, 2004
37,732
SUNNY SEAFORD
Leave it to the council. :lolol:
 


Marc

New member
Jul 6, 2003
25,267
no doubt LDC will be against any sort of demolition seeing as they are against EVERYTHING that has NOTHING to do with them...bastards :angry:
 






pasty

A different kind of pasty
Jul 5, 2003
31,036
West, West, West Sussex
sir danny cullip said:
Thank god for that, should have been knocked down years ago.

I concur. It has now become an eyesore and an embarassment to the town.
 


Father Jack

New member
Aug 21, 2005
1,708
Its a shame its being knocked down and i agree with Mark as i too enjoy looking at the two piers, however after the fires maybe it is time to put the old girl out of her misery.
 








Gully

Monkey in a seagull suit.
Apr 24, 2004
16,812
Way out west
Is there any way that some of the ironwork could be recycled and used in our new stadium, a sort of link with our past and the history of the City. More seriously, will there ever be another West Pier, I for one would love to see that happen. The new West Pier should have a similar relationship to the Brighton Pier as the old one did, providing the culture and pomp in contrast to the downmarket and gaudy. I know that piers are Victorian or Edwardian in origine, but we are marketing ourselves as the city by the sea, there are plenty of stunning developments planned to transform parts of the seafront, let's hope there is room for another pier.
 




smudge

Up the Albion!
Jul 8, 2003
7,376
On the ocean wave
Took em long enough to decide what to do with the old paddling pool, which I loved as a nipper. What do they do? Build a new one half the size then fill the original one in. Great! :angry:
 


Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,323
Living In a Box
Great shame and as I used to walk on it when a lot younger it has fond memories.

However it is dangerous now and will never be restored to former glory so this is the best solution.
 
Last edited:






CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,096
Nobel have won then. Cock knockers.

Another piece of the TOWN f***ed then, this town is gonna be like Blackpool in a few years.
 


Gully

Monkey in a seagull suit.
Apr 24, 2004
16,812
Way out west
This town will never be like Blackpool, it is far better, how dare you compare Brighton to a poxy has been seaside resort full of northern monkeys.
 


bigc

New member
Jul 5, 2003
5,740
Withdean Wanderer said:

But conservation group The Regency Society welcomed the move for health and safety reasons.

Chairman Roger Hinton said: "The sooner the wreckage of the concert hall goes the better. Our view has always been that it is not safe so we welcome this move."

Sad news:nono:

surely shouldn't it read?

our view has always been impaired by the Pier so we couldn't wait to tear it down and assert our NIMBY authority
 


Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
72,350
Withdean Wanderer said:
Dr Geoff Lockwood, chief executive of the West Pier Trust which owns the structure, said it was a necessary safety measure which would be financed by the planned Brighton Eye, a 600ft tower designed by the team behind the London Eye, which developers want to build at the foot of the pier.

He said: "We're looking at the best way of removing the wreckage. The idea is that we get it removed while we are building the Brighton Eye."

The trust is responsible for the cost of removing the wreckage and estimates it would cost up to £300,000. The trust will be negotiating with the architects of the Brighton Eye to determine who pays.

Dr Lockwood said: "No one's got that money and we want to raise that with the income stream from the Eye."

Dr Geoff Lockwood is one utterly ineffectual Grade-A wanker whose sole purpose seems to be to stand in front of the local TV cameras in his crap anorak and chuckle 'ho-ho, no need to worry, just a flesh wound. we can rebuild' whenever the pier was torched by criminals or another large chunk of it fell into the sea. Trust? I wouldn't trust him to run a whelk stall on the seafront. :censored:
 
Last edited:




zefarelly

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
22,789
Sussex, by the sea
Its a crying shame that . . .

it wasn't maintained to start with

Its been keft to rot

the beardy twats incharge of restoration didn't entertain more commercial ideas to finance repairs

no ones done anything to nail the c**ts ( palarse pier people ? ? ?) that did the last two rounds of deliberate damage


Now is the time to knock it down, BUT, only when plans are in place to replace it, and finance as well . . .we all know what happens if theyre not (goldstone ground, for those of you who don't)

the best thing that cvould happen in my opinion, is a new pier, in a new style, to suit Modern B&H, and to echo the purpose and versatility of the original

and put the Palarse pier chavtastic attractions in the shade ! :salute:
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here