Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

West ham lose Olympic stadium



Gus is god

Banned
Sep 9, 2011
1,637
Just seen the plug has been pulled on bbc.

seagulls
 








Gus is god

Banned
Sep 9, 2011
1,637
Good news for Orient. Surely neither Spurs or West Ham will want to be tennants?

Re reading it again, it just seems West Ham will rent it if they rebid, and the funding to convert will be done by the OLPC instead of a loan to West Ham, so i think the hammers win here
 


strings

Moving further North...
Feb 19, 2006
9,969
Barnsley
This is probably the best move for everyone. The stadium will remain in public ownership and be used for athletics. In addition to this paying tenant should pay the costs so that the stadium doesn't lie idle and a pointless strain on the public purse.

I wonder if they will revert to removing the top tier after the games as originally planned - surely Saracens would be interested in a 25,000 duel-use stadium. It is certainly better than the 15,000 duel-use, plastic pitched stadium they are looking at moving to.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,200
Goldstone
This is probably the best move for everyone. The stadium will remain in public ownership and be used for athletics.
Good news for Palace/Sainsburys, but does that mean WH will be stuck with a track around their pitch?
 


Seagull over Canaryland

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2011
3,557
Norfolk
Seems both parties get what they want ie a) a legacy for the Stadium and b) WHU get a new ground but as tenants rather than owners.

Presumably this deal would appear to make Spurs' issue about WHU receiving funding from the local authority to buy the stadium dead.

Cheaper deal in the short term for WHU and some adjustments will be made for footie but the stadium will remain configured for athletics.
 


n1 gull

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2003
4,639
Hurstpierpoint
It does mean Gold/Sullivan can sell Upton Park, pocket a load of dosh, then rent a ground at 2 million a year - that sounds
vaguely familiar..
 






Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,200
Goldstone
they were always going to keep it
I think Spurs were concerned that once WH had the stadium in the bank, they'd try and get the requirements for the track changed.
 


Gus is god

Banned
Sep 9, 2011
1,637
I think Spurs were concerned that once WH had the stadium in the bank, they'd try and get the requirements for the track changed.

Legally i dont think they would be allowed 2, now they wont have to invest any more in converting the stadium and just rent it, ok they wont own there ground but financially they will be better of, the only issue i could see it getting a loan.
 






SeagullSongs

And it's all gone quiet..
Oct 10, 2011
6,937
Southampton
Would I be correct in saying that the tenants get absolutely none of the money from food, drink, etc?

Absolute commercial suicide for West Ham if they rent it.
It'll also have a crap view. The closest seat behind the goal is currently 40m away. The furthest seat in WSU is only about 55m away from the pitch.
 


ILIKECANDLES

Banned
Sep 1, 2010
1,854
I hope they dont get it. Its completely unfair plus the designers of the stand have built nowhere their fans could park all those extra caravans....
 










Bob!

Coffee Buyer
Jul 5, 2003
11,636
Who are the 3 other bidders?
 




perseus

Broad Blue & White stripe
Jul 5, 2003
23,461
Sūþseaxna
£2 million a year is cheap. A Premier League academy costs £2 million a year to run. A slim chance for Leyton Orient?
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here