Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,321
Hodgson was quick to pass the buck that way. Doesn't really wash, not with the game all but goneSurely on the Palace medical team?
Hodgson was quick to pass the buck that way. Doesn't really wash, not with the game all but goneSurely on the Palace medical team?
Someone should probably tell him that then.No, he is a Brighton fan.
Quite. We've come back from 3-0 down to beat Leicester 4-3. Other teams have made similar comebacks and had similar turnarounds in performance from one half to the next. It was only last week that we conceded two goals in three minutes v Luton, two of the three goals we scored v palace were within minutes of each other. There was always the possibility that Palace (or any team 3-0 at half time) could turn it around, regardless of how well they played in the first half.Games have been brought back to 3-3 before (I'm not saying this one would've been) and he would be highly criticised for not playing their best player.
A manager can only act on the medical team's advice.
I think dadams2K etc was referring to the quoted passage by Scott McCarthy.
Oh! My apologies to dadams2k if so!I think dadams2K etc was referring to the quoted passage by Scott McCarthy.
It's easy to get crossed wires where posters are answering other posters.
Eze and Olise are by far their two best players. Everything revolves around them, and without them they’ve zero creativity. So IMO, yes they are massively affected by injury. We have more injuries but the difference with us is that we have better reinforcements and more flexibility, as under the RDZ system everyone knows the roles and (to some degree) can fill in the roles as needed.
That's easy to say off the back of a fine win. At the final whistle on Tuesday night it didn't feel as though all our 'options' had us NOT missing Mitoma, March and Co.The commentators on the NBC broadcast kept banging on about Palace missing Eze and Olise (even though one of them was actually on the bench) and I don't remember them once mentioning that Albion were without the likes of Mitoma, Adingra, March, Enciso, Veltman etc. Disappointing, particularly when the co-commentator was former Albion player Matt Upson. However, I guess it's a function of the fact that those two players are so huge to Palace that when they are missing Palace are in serious trouble whereas Albion genuinely are a team with options (albeit a team that contains some extremely talented individuals).
Well, we had a very decent 4-2 win at home to Spurs without those players, and we had a pretty full squad available to us when we got hammered 5-1 at home by Everton last season and 6-1 at Villa Park this. We seem to be perfectly capable of putting in a "Luton" performance even when everyone IS available.That's easy to say off the back of a fine win. At the final whistle on Tuesday night it didn't feel as though all our 'options' had us NOT missing Mitoma, March and Co.
I think dadams2K etc was referring to the quoted passage by Scott McCarthy.
No need, you were right. dadams presumably got confused and read the 90min.com article, and then quoted your post about the article the OP linked toOh! My apologies to dadams2k if so!