Surrey_Albion
New member
what makes me laugh is looking on amother teams forum at near the beginning of the season(unfortunately I can't remember who) thought all the spelling mistake such as "we're loose" were real and not parodies
Well, a ban would be appropriate, if NSC was a democracy!Thinking about changing it for next week.
What's the worst that could happen?
But IF we go up -how about changing it to For the Winning?
*shudder*
It was the best of times
It was the wurst of times
"He's" instead of "his" and vice versa is one that gets me, as in "his not good enough, get rid". See it quite often. Usually in that sort of context..Essentially some simpletons from the Facebook generation of kids were spelling 'we'll lose' this way & it was rightly humoured. This were instead of we'll really grinds my gears fwiw. Of instead of have is another creeping in.
Thinking about changing it for next week.
What's the worst that could happen?
I always though it was a tongue-in-cheek, self-deprecating reference to our collective sphincters
Please can we change it now I didn't get the in joke, I just think its a bit lame
from OwlTalk
Reserve Team Player
Sheffield Wednesday Fan
PipPipPip
751 posts
Posted 17 May 2016 - 07:07 AM
"were loose"? Is that a typo/grammatical error on their forum header? I don't get it
Thinking about changing it for next week.
What's the worst that could happen?
Who cares what they think? I agree it's run it's course, now and time for a change.
[MENTION=6886]Bozza[/MENTION] Maybe #together which has been the watchword for most of the season?
are sight, surely.
Should of, could of, would of ..... Grrrrrrrrrrrr
HAVE
FFS
As in, we would of been promoted if we only conceded TWO goals at home to Boro !
We could of scored ONE goal at home to Boro and been promoted.
We should of been promoted ...
it's "have" people ...
are sight, surely.
Agree - time to change it, I think.
Give it a few weeks and I might have the required enthusiasm. Right now, not so much.