Leekbrookgull
Well-known member
Good. Enjoy it !!!!
thats a good question, where exactly is government spending £150billion more than it recieves? btw, bailing the banks cost about £76billion in 2009, so the deficit for this year has nothing to do with bailing out banks. just budgeted overspending from the previous two or three finance bills.
The commitments include buying £76bn of shares in Royal Bank of Scotland and the Lloyds Banking Group; indemnifying the Bank of England against losses incurred in providing more than £200bn of liquidity support; guaranteeing up to £250bn of wholesale borrowing by banks to strengthen liquidity; providing £40bn of loans and other funding to Bradford & Bingley and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme; and insurance cover of over £280bn for bank assets.
Well it started with £789 million on the millennium dome,£825 million aid over three years to India( a country with nuclear weapons and a space programme), brown even managed to find £ 50 odd million to help 'impoverished' china cut its co2 emissions for fucks sake £ 5.6 billion on failed computer projects, £1.6 billion on management consultants just for starters, do you want me to go on ? i'm sure there's more i can dig up.
Please explainIf you want to bring up management consultants I will chuck in the image consultants that the public schoolboy, biscuit game playing fuckwit employed less than 6 months after failing to win an election that was an open goal.
I told you all before the election that if the Tories got in they would raise VAT to 20% based on their previous history of raising VAT once they got into power. I was basically called a scaremonger and for a FACT it wouldn't happen. Food prices will rise , although food is zero rated it still has to be transported and the increased fuel costs are passed on to the customer in higher prices at the checkout.
Osborne has gone a £10k holiday , how much of this will he claim back in expenses ? At least Blair had the nerve to ask his rich mates around the world for a freebie
Why would Vat effect the poorest the greatest. Most essentials are VAT free so if your poor you won't be able to afford most things that are VAT charagable.
Adult clothing, petrol, alcohol, fags, confectionery etc are all subject to VAT at the standard rate. The poorest decile spend 100% of their income, whilst the richest decile spend a much lower fraction of theirs, so proportionately the poor bear VAT hardest.
Adult clothing - dependant on what it is and how often it may be used but could be a luxury purchase
petrol - Luxury
alcohol - Luxury
fags - Luxury
confectionery - Luxury
All a matter of lifestyle choice and not essentials, anyone could decide not to buy any of those items during a month and therefore pay zero in VAT on these items.
Try telling anyone that lives out in the country, where there are no publick transport services, that petrol is a luxury.
The poorest decile spend 100% of their income, whilst the richest decile spend a much lower fraction of theirs, so proportionately the poor bear VAT hardest.
But that isn't unique to VAT. You could argue the poor spend a bigger proportion of their income on council tax, food, gas, electric, water, fuel and even holidays. It's not really that black and white.
Me too, which makes simonsimon's tedious posts even more nausiating. How long were Labour in power? 13 years? And did they ever cut VAT and increase income tax? No. Against that background, all this "Tory scum, vote vote vote Labour, smash the system" bullshit he posts sounds ever so slightly lame.I am not arguing that tax revenues should not be increased, I am arguing against Gideon Osborne's claim that an increase in VAT affects the poor least.
I personally think a banker/premeriship footballer/ accountant etc. should pay a lot more of the increased tax burden proportionately than a pensioner. You disagree and that's fair enough.
It seems we can't vote Labour now as Alan Johson has been seen having an expencive dinner at the Savoy. I think we should just shut the country down, and move to France.
Labour did propose.the increase of national insurance which was opposed by Tories and also labour did implement the new 50% top rate. But alas no decrease in vat.Me too, which makes simonsimon's tedious posts even more nausiating. How long were Labour in power? 13 years? And did they ever cut VAT and increase income tax? No. Against that background, all this "Tory scum, vote vote vote Labour, smash the system" bullshit he posts sounds ever so slightly lame.