HastingsSeagull
Well-known member
There are not many strikers who score 15 let alone 20 goals in a season and those who do are in team who dominate and create lots of chances. The problem is we do create lots of chances (and decent chances at that) but our returns are so low. It’s not as simple as wanting a 15 goal a season striker. Given the chances we create, we should be inflating striker numbers much like Peterborough do. Sadly this season they’ve fallen off despite chances going up. And loads of us predicted it in the summer when we were left with only Maupay and Connolly who both suit playing alongside another striker and who are too similar to work well together. If we get a ‘10-12 goal a season’ striker they should end up with 15 for us.
We’re so rich in other areas of the pitch is the crazy thing. I love the moneyball approach for our level, but we’ve built it now so we have too much depth to use (not a bad thing IF the cream does float to the top) but we could just use that one big time striker for a couple of years or experienced proven head to come in and fill the gap until the strikers are ready. It doesn’t have to be a change from our philosophy to bring ONE in once. You could argue we’ve done it before with Upson, Bridge and now Lallana and Welbeck (who’s a wide forward not a striker).
One Vardy and we’re top 6
One Ings we’re top 8
One Watkins we’re top 10
With the chances we’re creating a Murray from 2-3 years ago and we’re top 10
The chances we’re creating if you plug someone decent in we’ll inflate their price due to chances we supply them with and sell for a profit (to pay their wages) and be able to go with our youth at that point if we’re confident those are the answer!
We’re so rich in other areas of the pitch is the crazy thing. I love the moneyball approach for our level, but we’ve built it now so we have too much depth to use (not a bad thing IF the cream does float to the top) but we could just use that one big time striker for a couple of years or experienced proven head to come in and fill the gap until the strikers are ready. It doesn’t have to be a change from our philosophy to bring ONE in once. You could argue we’ve done it before with Upson, Bridge and now Lallana and Welbeck (who’s a wide forward not a striker).
One Vardy and we’re top 6
One Ings we’re top 8
One Watkins we’re top 10
With the chances we’re creating a Murray from 2-3 years ago and we’re top 10
The chances we’re creating if you plug someone decent in we’ll inflate their price due to chances we supply them with and sell for a profit (to pay their wages) and be able to go with our youth at that point if we’re confident those are the answer!