£1.99
Well-known member
- Mar 3, 2008
- 1,233
How much was that watch, £1.99?
About £360
I have 2 Steinharts, the Ocean One Vintage and a older version of the Triton 30atm.
Heres a link to the website http://www.steinhartwatches.de/en/
How much was that watch, £1.99?
Just as a matter of interest, if you owned a Ferrari, would you have it serviced by a trained mechanic at the garage down the road, or have it done by the accredited Ferrari dealership?
They want more control that's for sure but that is different matter altogether, by limiting supply they are putting watchmakers out of business unless they conform to Omega's rigid criteria and invest in set up costs. Omega thereby control the market and pricing for in house and their authorised independents much like Rolex do.
Omega and Rolex seek to do similar with Authorised dealers, rigid rules on discounting and selling, anyone that does not conform gets booted out. Moves to boutique outlets, all designed to give an aura of exclusivity and luxury but neverless a corporate move to monopolise the market and push out independents.
My Dad's old Longines Conquest. Wear it most days. Always left wrist, never in bed.
Looks the same as this:
View attachment 69957
View attachment 69966A tag, right wrist and I take it off when I get home. Not a massive fan of dials and numbers so own this.
Only bought it 35 days ago too!Date's wrong.
Just saying, like.
Omega of course restrict supply of parts. They will only supply parts to an independant, if they have an in store watchmaker, trained (by them) to work on Omega watches. Seems pretty sensible, and not at all unreasonable given that they are prepared to provide and fund training, and fund the watch-makers' school. Why on earth would you want your watch serviced by a self-taught or completely untrained person?
No. A turbillion or any other classic movement is a complex and beautiful piece of engineering. The complexity is deliberate - its a selling point. Its not to make it hard to service - though they are, of course.
Far worse time, in many, if not all cases. But to focus on that is to spectacularly miss the point. It would be like saying, "why buy a classic car, when you can get higher speed and better fuel economy from a new nissan micra?".
Am right handed, and wear it on the right wrist. So far, that's 132 posts on this thread, and only Acker & I wearing a watch on the right side.
You're all wrong'uns, you know that?
Occasionally swap mine to right wrist but then wear it facing "in", whereas wear it facing "out" on the left wrist normally.I like a classic (old-school?) look, and I have a Rotary Windsor watch very similar to this:-
View attachment 69950
It is worn on the left wrist and always taken off at night.
But this reminds me; my dad always wore a watch, but with the face on the INSIDE of his wrist. Just looking it up on google, it is suggested that soldiers did/do this to avoid the chance of reflection off the face giving away their position to the enemy. My dad fought at the end of the Second World War and so I wonder if it was a habit picked up from his army days?
Does anyone else wear the face on the inside?
Nobody considering one of these? http://www.wareable.com/android-wear/tag-heuer-android-wear-price-release-date-specs-958
Would like to see one in the flesh, sorely tempted though.
I originally skipped over this as not a fan of smart watches yet, but revisited the thread today for some reason and thought I would have a click - that is very clever and love the look of it, didnt realise its a Tag. Some really nice looking faces you use.
Problem for me though is that at £1100 its not much for a Tag but how long will it really last, I bought a F1 GMT earlier in the year as a gift for a birthday to myself and also as a close relative to me passed away so wanted to have a nice watch as a daily reminder. Now this watch I will keep but with a smart watch will I not want another in 12 months like I do phone?