[Albion] Was the penalty correctly awarded?

[Herr Tubthumper]

Not massively different to the one we got in Athens……..can’t really argue with the decision unfortunately

Pedro had his foot trod on if memory serves me correctly….that is quite different to today‘s barge/tangle.

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

We need Gary Birtles’ opinion.

 

[clapham_gull]

Yes it's a penalty but a silly one to give away.

 

[Skaville]

I think it probably was a penalty but not a clear and obvious error, confirmed by Pawson having to come to the screen and watch it several times

 

[kevo]

if the ref gave it on the field, then i’d say ‘incredibly soft, but supportable’. but VAR should never, ever, ever be getting involved in that. clear and obvious my arse. we wouldn’t get a VAR intervention on a call like that in a million years

This is the key thing. The 'big' clubs get these, we don't.

 

[hans kraay fan club]

mean it’s basically a hand-off,

that is quite different to today‘s barge/tangle.

It isn’t given for a hand-off, nor for a barge. That is the coming together that Pawson saw, and chose not to give.

Watch it back again, and focus only on their feet. It’s a very clear foul

 

[dazzer6666]

Pedro had his foot trod on if memory serves me correctly….that is quite different to today‘s barge/tangle.

Nah, had the back of his leg knocked

 

[Questions]

It’s one I’ll file under: I can understand why it was given. But, it was very soft.

I’d claim it.

 

[Questions]

Does ‘Clear and obvious error’ even exist ?
Or is it a Tom Clancy novel ?

 

[Questions]

Initially it was a coming together and 50-50 but then Milner goes beyond that and commits the foul.
I don't understand what is and what isnt considered clear and obvious though.

Well I think this is the area that supporters would like explaining a little more accurately because I personally haven’t got a scooby on it.

 

[Sarisbury Seagull]

Definite penalty for me. I’m surprised by how many were adamant it wasn’t.

 

[hart's shirt]

"Whether it's a penalty or it's not a penalty, the game is being ruined."
- Jonathan Pearce on VAR

 

[clapham_gull]

I've changed my mind after watching it again from the behind the goal angle. Incredibly harsh.

 

[Justice]

Definite penalty for me. I’m surprised by how many were adamant it wasn’t.

Milner played as he should the ball was gone bad touch by the player and Milner went across Mudryk. How is that a penalty? Milner is defending the space between Mudryk and the ball

 

[kevo]

Having just seen it on MOTD, there is no way in a million years that before VAR that would have been given as a pen. Milner is just shielding it back to the keeper.

 

[shingle]

No penalty. Both the pundits on MOTD 2 say the same. Anyway move on, onwards and upwards.

 

[kevo]

Definite penalty for me. I’m surprised by how many were adamant it wasn’t.

Lol

 

[Justice]

Having just seen it on MOTD, there is no way in a million years that before VAR that would have been given as a pen. Milner is just shielding it back to the keeper.

It’s two refs having different opinions absolutely not what VAR is meant to be used to.

 

[METALMICKY]

I've changed my mind after watching it again from the behind the goal angle. Incredibly harsh.

Agree having seen all the angles on Match of the Day. It's a two part problem. One is subjective in that you can debate all day about whether the contact is a foul. The second problem is the incorrect application of what we are told is the VAR principle. The ref doesn't give it so VAR gets involved and declares it a clear and obvious error when it is far from clear and obvious. On that basis you go with the original decision of no penalty.

 

[Kalimantan Gull]

Having just seen it on MOTD, there is no way in a million years that before VAR that would have been given as a pen. Milner is just shielding it back to the keeper.

How can you 'shield the ball to the keeper' by taking out the guys legs - thats just daft! If Milner wants to do that he HAS to stay on his feet.

Its one of the clearest penalties I've seen this season.