Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Was that a penalty to B’muff???

Penalty or not?

  • Stonewaller

    Votes: 35 32.1%
  • Absolutely no chance that was a penalty

    Votes: 74 67.9%

  • Total voters
    109


jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
15,034
it was a clear penalty, got away with it on this occasion, much as Konate got away with the red on MacAllister last week.
 




East London Exile

Active member
Jan 13, 2013
100
London
Looking again at the replay, Pervis keeps running in a direct line chasing the ball then their player moves in and bounces off Pervis. If Pervis had not held his line and moved toward their player then I think a penalty may have been given.
 


warmleyseagull

Well-known member
Apr 17, 2011
4,417
Beaminster, Dorset
One of those 'would have been free-kick anywhere else on pitch' ones IMO. Sort of umpire's choice; VAR wouldn't have on field decision reviewed either way. no third box, so cant vote.
 


US Seagull

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
4,815
Cleveland, OH
I've seen them given for less. I've seen this not given for more.

We rode our luck with that one.
 


5Ways Gull

È quello che è
Feb 2, 2009
1,237
Fiveways, Brighton
The handball was an odd one, it seemed to leave the ball miles away from anyone, right in the middle of the penalty area, if a Bournemouth player had managed to get there first he'd have probably scored.
 




Jeremiah

John 14 : 6
Mar 15, 2020
2,595
Hove
I didn't spot it at the game at all , but judging by Estupinan's reaction I think he thought it was going to be given.
 


Scotchegg

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2014
316
Brighton
I dunno I thought we were lucky to get away with both of them, not really because they were stonewall pens or anything, but with the way VAR is such an absolute shitshow from week to week you never know what the given directive is. We seem to be in a bit of a hands off phase this past couple of weeks, so based on that I'd say neither were.

It's a complete mess, but fine by me this weekend...
 






Arthritic Toe

Well-known member
Nov 25, 2005
2,497
Swindon
It was reckless by Perv - right on the border between pen/non-pen. He didn't need to use that amount of force in that situation.
 


Stephen Seagull

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2015
466
Barcelona
I consider it to be the same as the Haaland shove on Webster. The refs allowed that and, for once, there’s consistency
 


Mackenzie

Old Brightonian
Nov 7, 2003
34,112
East Wales
Nice for us to benefit from a decision for once, I’ve seen them given. Fortunately we were only playing Bournemouth not one of the better financed clubs.
 












Blues Guitarist

Well-known member
Oct 19, 2020
618
St Johann in Tirol
When you consider the decisions that have gone against us recently - 3 possible red cards for Liverpool and the Wellbeck penalty against Leicester, absolutely no way was that a penalty to B'muff.
 


highflyer

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2016
2,573
If it hadn't been given against us, I'd be annoyed.
So yes. Probably a penalty
However, the ref was letting things go all over tbe pitch, for both sides so at least consistent in tbat respect.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here