Vokes?

[sir albion]

Worth a punt at 500k and only 22?
Has good potential and will certainly improve,i would buy him

Sam Vokes set to fetch £500k for Wolves in move Shropshire Star

 

[looney]

No.

 

[Charlies Shinpad]

No chance

 

[Telford Seagull]

In fairness he looked impressive to start and wouldnt be the worst signing but i'd much rather someone else

 

[sir albion]

He just needs to settle somewhere and play more regularly,certainly worth a punt

 

[leigull]

Would prefer Vokes at £500k to some of the over priced, aged 30 and over strikers being mentioned on here

 

[severnside gull]

I would rate him fair value and a handy addition at £200K to £300K even in today's over-inflated market.

But £500K? No thanks

 

[albion534]

Problem with target men, is they will never score many goals, and hardly set the world alight

I liked him! 500k for a 22 year old striker is good! Rather that then £100,000,000,000,000,000 for zaha's foot

 

[sir albion]

3 goals in 14 games=9 in 42 games and similar to our strikers who also had shite service.

Been on loan to about 6 clubs in 4 years,fresh start and i reckon he would be great.

 

[Pinkie Brown]

Done nothing last season to suggest he's worth splashing money on. Bar the odd glimpse here and there, he looked mediocre to average most games. Not the worst player we've had by a mile, but feel we could do better.

 

[Stat Brother]

Done nothing last season to suggest he's worth splashing money on. Bar the odd glimpse here and there, he looked mediocre to average most games. Not the worst player we've had by a mile, but feel we could do better.

Fair assessment.
£500k (where did that figure come from) is stoopid money.

Barnes, Hoskins & Agdestein mean we won't be £500k on an also ran.

CMS will get either a proper signing for proper (scary) money, to play with.
Or the fellas we've already got.

 

[albionalex]

He's not the answer.

 

[catfish]

Not an improvement on any of our current strikers. So no.

 

[Vegas Seagull]

Two bob

 

[Napper]

Rather him than no one but prefer someone better

 

[deletebeepbeepbeep]

If we were going to sign an ex loan player it would be Wood.

 

[Seasidesage]

Fair player and different to our other strikers but would hope we can find more of a goal threat elsewhere

 

[Blackadder]

Not really what we are looking for.

 

[BensGrandad]

Rather him than no one but prefer someone better

Not sure I agree with that as he is no better than what we have already. So no I would only take him if he was free.

 

[Icy Gull]

Absolutely no pace at all from what I saw of him, essential at this level imo, I'll be amazed if Gus signs him.