nicko31
Well-known member
So the paper that put Jo Cox's death on page 28 will no longer will available, gutted...
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Travel] Virgin bin The Daily Mail
- Thread starter Herr Tubthumper
- Start date
Seasidesage
New member
Never trusted that prick since Virgin sponsored you know who...
super-seagulls
Soup! Why didn’t I get any Soup?
Lord Voldemort?
D
Deleted member 22389
Guest
Not really news is it, but I suppose it gets some of those extreme lefties excited, let them have it.
pastafarian
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #26
The hastily arranged reworking of the paper that day.
Perhaps newspapers could employ psychics to anticipate events and enable them to print in advance .
Ernest
Stupid IDIOT
Should sell the Morning Star instead
That's quite a meeting: Daily Mail v Branson - hard to know which one is more obnoxious.
It's a bit rich for the Mail to howl about censorship, since when it has been Tory policy that private companies can't do what they want (within the law)? Imagine the protests if the Mail were told what news they had to print.
It's a bit rich for the Mail to howl about censorship, since when it has been Tory policy that private companies can't do what they want (within the law)? Imagine the protests if the Mail were told what news they had to print.
B-right-on
Living the dream
This. Both as garbage as each other.
- Thread starter
- #31
Perhaps they could just do the decent thing in the first place?
half time scores
Well-known member
If you read newspapers you are misinformed if you don't you are uninformed.
Only people excited on this thread appear to be the extreme right wingers/whingers and the usual broflakes
Iggle Piggle
Well-known member
- Sep 3, 2010
- 5,956
I'm no fan of the mail. I'm often staggered when I sift through a copy at the in laws at the scare mongering and hyperbole of the headlines to get a few tuts from a blue rinse in Tunbridge Wells.
That said, I hate this modern trend to stop advertising in the current bun by complaining on Twitter or in this case Branson deciding what we can and can't read. If someone wants to read why Melanie Philips thinks poor people should be shot or why immigration is terrible in the comfort of thier Spanish villa let them. It's a free country.
That said, I hate this modern trend to stop advertising in the current bun by complaining on Twitter or in this case Branson deciding what we can and can't read. If someone wants to read why Melanie Philips thinks poor people should be shot or why immigration is terrible in the comfort of thier Spanish villa let them. It's a free country.
Raleigh Chopper
New member
And if you make a tunic and trousers out of one you are uniformed.
Full circumstances not known as the story first broke? Or does that not fit the the anti-right agenda?
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Mark Twain and was my signature for a few months.
Wrong-Direction
Well-known member
- Mar 10, 2013
- 13,638
All media is full of shit
Sent from my SM-A310F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-A310F using Tapatalk
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
Oh the Irony, doing a hit peice on a paper that sells ten times the amount than the one you have linked/shilled for.
Heres a good reveiw of the Guardian.
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/412887-guardian-uk-media-russia-/
I love this bit...
"However, its detractors have a different point of view. Spewing bile at “Guardianistas” and the “Grauniad” itself, they brand it an issues-led rag which nobody actually reads. They correctly point out that the Guardian ‘boasts’ the lowest daily sale of any UK national newspaper. This stood at 156,756 copies in January of this year. By contrast, the conservative Daily Mail still flogs 1,511,357 a day, on average. The Mail also trumps the Guardian online, when it comes to popularity."
