el punal
Well-known member
This post in the Poyet thread made me think...
... just what would we have got out of Vicente, if he'd played under Chris Hughton?
My view is that the sublimely talented but chronically fragile Vicente was clearly exceptionally high maintenance. I imagine he needed constant attention from the management team - cuddles, sympathy, daily reminders of how lovely and special he was, promises to set things up to get the best from his special talent. Gus Poyet's ego was NEVER going to stand for all that - not a chance.
Now, ignoring that it was almost certainly Gus' self-confidence and charisma that actually persuaded El Punal to come here in the first place, and without that we'd not have had a hope of signing him, just how might things have panned out under a different Amex-era manager?
I think that Oscar and Vicente might well have 'clicked' to the benefit of all, though with the pair of them being rather unstable, there would probably be a train-wreck at the end of it.
Sami would have played him at centre-back or in goal, resulting in permanent 'head's not right' status.
Nathan Jones could have found a way to get the best out of him I think, but would his lack of pedigree / experience have earned him sufficient respect from Vicente for him to listen to his ideas?
Then Chris Hughton - he is clearly a very good man manager. Good enough to have got Vicente on the pitch more than a dozen times a season, and then used his skill to actually AFFECT rather than just EMBELLISH matches?
thoughts?
El Punal apparently posts many random and inconsequential piles of guff on this board. He's also a totally crap footballer, drinks like a fish in particular Guinness and red wine (decent stuff, mind). Enough of me though, the REAL El Punal will always live in our memories unlike the charlatan **** writing this.