It's so difficult to know what the final outcome of the game would have been if it had been allowed - so it's virtually impossible to say for definite that it cost us the win. We may not have scored a second, and still let in a howler. Who knows.
I agree that VAR needs to go but where would all these fans meet-up/protest to show their dislike of VAR in this modern world? Snap chat? NSC? Facebook?If football belongs to the fans it's surely time that fans of football came together and collectively and put VAR where it belongs,in the f***ing bin.
That doesn't really make sense - all that would happen is that there'd be arguments about 300mm+/-2mm.My opinion is VAR should only intervene for offside if the player is deemed over a certain measurement offside, 300mm for example. This stupid couple of mm shit is mad, bad for the game and clearly relies on the human clicking the exact part if the body and freezing exactly as the ball is kicked. With some of the stupidly tight calls that happen every week I can't see how the accuracy can be confirms.
It’s a good shout this. The problem with it though is that it means that the premier league would have to use a different offside rule to the rest of the football pyramid and really that makes it a non-starter.Can’t they just put some sort of tag on all the players which can trigger a signal that an attacker is behind all the defenders?No need for rules such as arms, legs and earlobes being offside or not. We just accept the tag makes the call
The VAR ref that day was Neil Swarbrick. As mentioned on MOTD, he is the head VAR ref - and was responsible for not giving Chelsea the penalty today.I'm still dumbfounded about the tackle on Ferguson 2 weeks ago how that was not punished correctly so god knows how long this balls up will take to leave my fuming brain.
Well, it finally puts the bed the favouring of 'big' teams. Both Arsenal and Chelsea were on the receiving end today. Ours was just a monumental cock up.