- Jul 6, 2011
- 2,427
Tough one. Both have good bantz, but Webster seems like he can take a joke well too. This for a dream dinner party lineup?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] Van Hecke or Webster?
- Thread starter Mel37
- Start date
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,701
Neither looks all that great to be honest. Wouldn't take a lot to bring in an upgrade on either. IMHO, like
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,313
Luton's only strength is their physicality. Surely you go with Webster to match up against that, plus he's good in the air at both ends.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,950
If we are being conservative, Webster, If we are going for it JPVH. I'm not sure where Igor fits as he looks very Brazilian going forward. Unfortunately he also looks a bit Brazilian when defending. I'm quite relaxed about it as it's RDZ's responsibility and he will get the praise/blame/whatever 
JPvH deserves a run in the team IMO.
Kalimantan Gull
Well-known member
Either both or neither. I'm feeling saucy!
Gabbiano
Well-known member
Well if we’re talking physicality you’d surely go Dunk and Igor?
Between JPVH and Webster, I’d lean towards JP, but only marginally because I think he’s the better passer.
brighton_tom
Well-known member
- Jul 23, 2008
- 5,601
Webster, for now.
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,313
Putting in a bloke who is barely off the plane is a risk, especially with us playing out from the back, so no to Igor starting. His time will come though.
Seasider78
Well-known member
- Nov 14, 2004
- 6,023
Webster if can get run of games without injury then Igor as backup and think JPVH will be used in domestic cups to get more experience
Mancgull
Well-known member
I thought JPVH looked really good for the second half on Sunday. Seemed really confident. Maybe it was our £10’s of million valuation to Ajax that boosted his confidence.
If it was, then great.
Thought Webster looked shaky first half. Could have a slight knock.
Thankfully I’m not the manager.
Also thought Dahoud looked off the pace whereas he looked good in the US.
Could just be an issue of the intensity of training and then a game straight after. Maybe why Roberto has given them a day or two off, so they are really ready to go on Saturday.
If it was down to me I’d go JP.
If it was, then great.
Thought Webster looked shaky first half. Could have a slight knock.
Thankfully I’m not the manager.
Also thought Dahoud looked off the pace whereas he looked good in the US.
Could just be an issue of the intensity of training and then a game straight after. Maybe why Roberto has given them a day or two off, so they are really ready to go on Saturday.
If it was down to me I’d go JP.
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,313
At least he was still on the pitch.
Van Hecke - but only because I get the feeling (based on nothing at all, TBH) that he isn't a de Zerbi type player. Van Hecke could, I think, ultimately be Dunk's long term replacement - he'll need to be patient for that though.
Wonder if we might go three at the back, as we did when Ben White was here - Van Hecke-Dunk-Igor might work. Probably unlikely to happen though.
Wonder if we might go three at the back, as we did when Ben White was here - Van Hecke-Dunk-Igor might work. Probably unlikely to happen though.
Webster, easily.
For the first chunk of the season I do predict enough minor errors and maybe the odd big gaffe, from whoever plays, to validate the opposite opinion.
Not Spanish Dave
Active member
- Feb 23, 2013
- 136
Couldnt have described it any better. Bravo
portslade seagull
Well-known member
Van Hecke for me
- Jul 7, 2003
- 47,666
Everyone assuming that Dunk (one game since May) will be fit (and match ready)?