Anyone else had their reply from PB yet ? A fair enough response and agrees timing was wrong. Same reply to all ?
Yet another example of bad decision-making within our club.
The list is getting very long.
Anyone else had their reply from PB yet ? A fair enough response and agrees timing was wrong. Same reply to all ?
Yet another example of bad decision-making within our club.
The list is getting very long.
What is truly shocking is the identity of some of the posters who are being very critical of the Club. They should be very worried, but I doubt that they are.It was a laughably shit email, but the pointless handwringing on here is a joke.
"out of touch with supporters"? FFS that is pathetic.
It's not a board headed by Vincent Tan is it?
What is truly shocking is the identity of some of the posters who are being very critical of the Club. They should be very worried, but I doubt that they are.
Just had my reply from Paul. He acknowledges that a young marketing team got it wrong but with the best of intentions and that they will learn from it. Can't ask for any more and this is the first time a CEO has responded directly to me at this time of night. We all make mistakes, it's how you respond to them that matters.
Sorry, you're going to have to elaborate I think.What is truly shocking is the identity of some of the posters who are being very critical of the Club. They should be very worried, but I doubt that they are.
Sorry, you're going to have to elaborate I think.
This club has already had the same number of people through the Amex turnstiles as we managed in ten seasons at Withdean. So the way I see it is why should the club be worried that some people who were quite blatantly part of the cosy Withdean old guard are now being melodramatic over a badly timed email?
Seriously, perhaps you need to explain it.
What is truly shocking is the identity of some of the posters who are being very critical of the Club. They should be very worried, but I doubt that they are.
Sorry Paul but that comes across as very much a case of sour grapes, I would have expected a man with your financial expertise to be in favour of anything that raises revenue and thus aids the club we all love.All you will get will be a bland reply from someone who is out of touch with the supporters. A full apology on the Club's website wouldn't go amiss, but I won't hold my breath. Very very disillusioned about the Club and the direction it is going. Such a shame, especially after all DK & TB have put into it. The uptake of ST & 1901 renewals for next season will be interesting.
As a club we are quite aware of the comments on this thread from all those who've contributed. To provide some perspective, this was one member of staff, trying to show some initiative, who simply made an error of judgement. We appreciate the timing wasn't perfect, and apologies to anyone who was genuinely offended (although, I would hope nobody was actually offended by the email). We do appreciate that some NSCers prefer not to receive these marketing emails, and some have made that very clear, but these e-mail campaigns are just one form of marketing which help the club boost its commercial revenue. We'd prefer you didn't of course, but fans can opt out of receiving such emails.
The Marketing department at the club is a bloody amateurish embarrassment.
I don't need to explain anything. I was merely pointing out that I was shocked to realise how disillusioned some of my fellow members of the Falmer For All team have become with the Club. And I'm not just thinking of Paul Samrah.Sorry, you're going to have to elaborate I think.
This club has already had the same number of people through the Amex turnstiles as we managed in ten seasons at Withdean. So the way I see it is why should the club be worried that some people who were quite blatantly part of the cosy Withdean old guard are now being melodramatic over a badly timed email?
Seriously, perhaps you need to explain it.