User nominated bannings

[Return of the Rev]

Hang em all!

 

[Kazenga <3]

I nominate Bozza.

 

[seagullondon]

I nominate Bozza.

I echo these sentiments

 

[Return of the Rev]

i nominate bozza.

I think just a warning,he's only young.

 

[Seagull kimchi]

Isn't it the 'emotionally unstable' posters that really heat this place up. Let's not ostracise those who are already marginalised and maligned by society?

 

[deletebeepbeepbeep]

I post on somethingawful which is a pay to post forum run off a comedy/humour website.

They used to have a section called helldump where you could call out persistantly bad posters with examples of why they are bad at posting. And then at the end of the month, the forum would choose who to ban.

Think they eventually got rid of it due to causing binfest and it used to trip into peoples private lives a bit too much.

Some posters on that website were the dregs of society though tbh, with many more issues than those on here (as weird as that sounds).

 

[leigull]

Bad idea IMO and would need too much extra admin from for the mods. No one would keep up with who has been nominated and so would lead to repeat nominations, despite the once in 3 months rule.

What's wrong with the mods deciding themselves if someone is being delibrately irritating on a constant basis?

 

[Beach Hut]

If ever there was something to cause a binfest it would be adopting these type of rules

 

[Pretty pink fairy]

Bad idea IMO and would need too much extra admin from for the mods. No one would keep up with who has been nominated and so would lead to repeat nominations, despite the once in 3 months rule.

What's wrong with the mods deciding themselves if someone is being delibrately irritating on a constant basis?

probably because what some people find irritating others find amusing ?

 

[Superphil]

Would it be anonymous?

 

[ROSM]

It could turn out like the life of Brian!

'Welease Wodewick'

 

[leigull]

probably because what some people find irritating others find amusing ?

I think they know enough to be able to gauge the general consensus on what posters are just mischief making

 

[Biscuit]

Not sure the 24 hour thing works for me. Maybe a week?

 

[Ernest]

If ever there was something to cause a binfest it would be adopting these type of rules

YOU will BE first to BE banned

 

[Drumstick]

Who will be the first to nominate [MENTION=6886]Bozza[/MENTION]

Or vote off the winning person in the vcash game to allow second place to win??

 

[Dave the OAP]

i think its a brilliant idea

I nominate someone who works for the government, wears rose coloured spectacles and is never ever wrong, no siree.

...and actors

...and bankers getting huge bonuses...you cant fool me marcus

...all these WSU oiks who thing they can lord ity over everyone just cos the sit near bloom

...all teh racists and pwoper nawty geezers

...all the bleeding heart liberals.

...all the soft southern blouse wearing shandy drinking poofs

That just leaves me, ROSM, The Club press Officer, and fellow 5:32 crew.

Utopia

Sounds like a plan

 

[Husty]

Remember the reputation system? Just dont try it. At the very least you need to drasticly increase the number of seconders.

 

[Monsieur Le Plonk]

Isn't that exactly what the Ignore function is for?

Exactly.
Otherwise any latent NSC cliques might be tempted to materialise which cannot be very healthy. Whoever has complained to you is a 'big boy' I'm sure who can either fight his own battles or use the ignore function.

 

[Dave the OAP]

oh yes, leave guiness dave and buzzer in here too, the rest of you can , I think the phrase is "do one"

 

[Giraffe]

Why not bring the Like and Dislike system back and then ban people who get a certain amount of dislikes ? Much less administration that way !

For the record, I think it's a NAFF idea.

I was a big fan of the like/dislike. I think if we had left in place for six months then people would have seen it as a positive thing. I say bring back the rep.

But I do vaguely the Bozza idea. May be more complex to manage from a moderator point of view than the rep though.