With Palace not paying the rent and so in breach of their lease agreement are they as such squatting. If so are they 1, allowed to trade on the premises? and 2, charge people to access something they have no legal right to themselves?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Use of Selhurst is it legal
- Thread starter PILTDOWN MAN
- Start date
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,015
its not squating as they have an agreement to rent. the fact the rent is unpaid is simply a matter between them and the landlord to resolve the outstanding payment.
squaters do not have any agreement to use the property.
squaters do not have any agreement to use the property.
Two Professors
Two Mad Professors
Just a normal travellers arrangement
Paul Skinback
New member
- Oct 3, 2009
- 504
Not that i give a shit about your feelings towards us, but i hope your ma is ok.
He is gone.
wigman
Well-known member
On that point.how much rent money do they owe?
BensGrandad
New member
Doesnt one of his companies own Selhurst Park and what is the liklehood of Ron Noades buying them again, although I am sure I read that he was skint. Noticed Coppell wore a Palace tie on TV earlier today.
deletebeepbeepbeep
Well-known member
- May 12, 2009
- 21,798
Ron Noades is skint, been hit hard by the economy, especially the golf club.
- Thread starter
- #9
Apparently have not paid any rent for over a year. If this is so then their agreement must be in default, and consequently their lease void. From the items I've read there is no dispute bar the fact they have not paid. I just wondered what the right is to carry on a business in premises you have no right to occupy.