gregbrighton
New member
It's no worse than a belt round he ear in the old Hovis days. What's the problem. Softies.
No. It is the brain.
You may be an excellent coach but not all coaches will show the same levels of care for their charges. Children sometimes need protecting from over-enthusiastic amateurs.
It is the brain. Other bits all recover.
I disagree. Times change. Like outlawing the tackle from behind.
Other parts of the body - carry on as you like. The brain ? No.
I'm just amazed it has taken them this long. Everything that carries even the slightest element of risk will eventually get banned in the USA.
Except carrying loaded guns around, of course.
Kids bang their heads all the time, heaviest part of their body, they fall off things, bang into things, clash heads running around. Goodness me. U10's rarely head it as it is. You may as well make rugby style head gear compulsory for all kids just to wear whenever they wake up. It would make no difference to kids football U10 and below - because most of them don't head it anyway, and it's not often the ball is headable anyway given the power they have to kick it.
What happens when some kid gets it full on in the head or face accidentally? Mild panic pitch side? Seriously, a ban...
Well if it rarely happens it won't be a problem will it ?
And accidental clashes and balls in the face are never going to be stopped. It is a contact sport.
It's part of the game, if you don't like it, don't let your kids play it. Typical of the Americans, doing their utmost to b astardise everything.
So why ban it? Why ban something that is a fairly rare, and can happen accidentally anyway?
Short corners and goal kicks will encourage better footballing skills.
Keeping the ball on the deck is what kids should be taught anyway.
Kids will think to pass rather than hoof.
Kids will learn to try and control difficult high balls instead of just jumping at it with their eyes shut.
Short corners and goal kicks will encourage better footballing skills.
Keeping the ball on the deck is what kids should be taught anyway.
Kids will think to pass rather than hoof.
Kids will learn to try and control difficult high balls instead of just jumping at it with their eyes shut.
Funny how a heading debate has suddenly brought up 'hoofing'. I always thought opposite ends of the body were involved..........Short corners and goal kicks will encourage better footballing skills.
Keeping the ball on the deck is what kids should be taught anyway.
Kids will think to pass rather than hoof.
Kids will learn to try and control difficult high balls instead of just jumping at it with their eyes shut.
What a load of utter rollox. Just tell them that God will protect them!
Funny how a heading debate has suddenly brought up 'hoofing'. I always thought opposite ends of the body were involved..........
Best teach them the only thing they're allowed to do is pass across or back, never more than a foot off the ground and never further than five yards. They'll soon give up playing football then, so the safety problem will be solved.
If you watch Kids play football, you'll notice most kids don't actually enjoy heading the ball. Most of the kids keep their eyes shut.
What's the point in making a kid do something it's scared of?
Why not teach the kids skills rather than bravery?
So no one is teaching skills because we're too busy coaching bravery and heading? Can skills, ball on the deck, and heading not coexist without the need for a ban?