No not Suzanne. I am an Astronomer, thus VegaYou're probably right, Vega (or is it Suzanne?), hence the need for action. Nice star, by the way.
Thanks for the Cert.No. 'Seagulls
Keep them coming!
No not Suzanne. I am an Astronomer, thus VegaYou're probably right, Vega (or is it Suzanne?), hence the need for action. Nice star, by the way.
Thanks for the Cert.No. 'Seagulls
Keep them coming!
I thought the whole point in the stones was to pay £100 toward the stadium, not the stones themselves? It's like giving to a charity and expecting a gift in return. Surely it'll cost the club money to make them better, thus defeating the object.
I thought the whole point in the stones was to pay £100 toward the stadium, not the stones themselves? It's like giving to a charity and expecting a gift in return. Surely it'll cost the club money to make them better, thus defeating the object.
Your thoughts are therefore somewhat different to mine and a lot of others then!
By the time you factor in the cost of producing the stones, Parkers cut, laying them and all the admin hassle that goes with them, I doubt there was much "donation" element to them. I have also just checked the club's PR on them and cant see any specific mention/spin of "charitable" donation. There would have been much more efficient ways of getting donations if that were the aim.
They were sold as being our chance to be a part of the stadium for the lifetime of the stadium. Many people have bought them as memorial stones for deceased. As others have pointed out, they dont look as though they will last until the end of the first season!
So I wholly disagree with your attitude of dont moan about it in this instance!!