El Sid
Well-known member
Seriously, this is in my earnest opinion, I think, a grave matter.
Nevertheless, however, it's all crap and I do not give a shit.
Nevertheless, however, it's all crap and I do not give a shit.
The problem is that are teachers don't know there arses from they're elbows. They should of and could of spent more time spending you're money making sure their are less chances that were loose out in overall educational standards.
hang on a moment, "should have and could have", shirley?...
I am sorry if i annoy people on here with my spelling .
Were they the only two you spotted?
no they where not, i just wonder if they are deliberate or a oversite.
Double negatives don't never wind me up or perturb me in the slightest at all.
The line between deliberate and intentional errors/mistakes and those that are unintended and accidental is becoming blurred and distorted!
I really get wound up by people who use the word "regularly" when they mean "frequently" .... especially when it is by otherwise intelligent people.
For example; recently on a TV post-match report a so-called expert said "Rooney regularly scores goals like that" ... which (it seems to me) would mean that at that time, in every match, in that position Rooney scores the same type of goal - which surely would be quite simple to defend?
Slightly off-topic I realise but it winds me up!!
I really get wound up by people who use the word "regularly" when they mean "frequently" .... especially when it is by otherwise intelligent people.
For example; recently on a TV post-match report a so-called expert said "Rooney regularly scores goals like that" ... which (it seems to me) would mean that at that time, in every match, in that position Rooney scores the same type of goal - which surely would be quite simple to defend?
Slightly off-topic I realise but it winds me up!!
Not sure I hear this one out of a snooker context very often but I love it when they say "betwixt and between", as if being betwixt is not bad enough, but between as well!!!