Ulloa v Abrahams?

[Rod Marsh]

Given choice I'd go for Abraham. He offers pace on the break. I can see us being even more of a counter attacking side next season.

 

[BensGrandad]

I liked Ulloa but I think GM offers more but LU offers more than Hemed if we could get a good price for him. Abraham is a totally different type of player to any of the 3 mentioned.

 

[Perkino]

For a number of seasons we have been in desperate need of a pacey striker who will play off the shoulder of the last defender. I'd love Ulloa back as he has bags of quality and you cannot play a big part in a premiership title winning side and not be half decent, but I wouldn't want him back if it ment we didn't sign a pacey striker.

 

[TSB]

[TWEET]880820239667277825[/TWEET]

#rightagain

 

[sparkie]

Would be excellent to get Leo back, providing we also sign a 'speedy sidekick' striker.

 

[The_Viper]

GM is better than Ulloa so what's the point?

Yet to see a Premier League medal around Muzzas neck, to be honest I've yet to see him score more goals, make more appearances or anything that makes him better to be honest at the top level, and I think Glenn is great.

 

[BensGrandad]

If Ulloa came back it would be to battle for the starting spot with GM which we have TH doing at the moment. Much as I liked Leo he is not the speedy co striker that we need.

 

[Albion Dan]

I think Leo gets a ridiculously tough ride on here. We all thought he was better then GM when he was last with us and Id say hes at least on par. He's scored some important prem league goals, has experience fighting relegation and winning the league, and would be a very decent addition.

 

[GreersElbow]

Get Leo in, then still have the same problem as we did before got Leo.

Superb.

 

[GreersElbow]

I think Leo gets a ridiculously tough ride on here. We all thought he was better then GM when he was last with us and Id say hes at least on par. He's scored some important prem league goals, has experience fighting relegation and winning the league, and would be a very decent addition.

All very true, but that doesn't solve our crucial problem of the lack of pace upfront. We need pace upfront because we will in no doubt be aiming for counter attacking football.

 

[Albion Dan]

All very true, but that doesn't solve our crucial problem of the lack of pace upfront. We need pace upfront because we will in no doubt be aiming for counter attacking football.

We need at least two strikers and if be happy if Leo was one if someone with pace is the other.

 

[Wellesley]

I think he would be an excellent signing and I am unanimous in that. (is he Dutch?)

 

[GreersElbow]

We need at least two strikers and if be happy if Leo was one if someone with pace is the other.

We'd need at least 2 pacey strikers, given Baldock has a history of injuries.

 

[Wardy's twin]

But Leo now has two years PL experience which is also what we are looking at and at a price which is not too high. I agree though we need some pace down the middle...

 

[severnside gull]

Really don't see why, with Murray and Hemed, we would look at adding Ulloa.
Pace is going to be essential so an upgrade on Baldock has to be the priority.

 

[sparkie]

Really don't see why, with Murray and Hemed, we would look at adding Ulloa.
Pace is going to be essential so an upgrade on Baldock has to be the priority.

We really need 5 strikers ( as we don't have a premier league quality U21 forward ).

So Hemed, Murray, Ulloa, Baldock and "Speedy Other" would be fine.

 

[Paris]

But Leo now has two years PL experience which is also what we are looking at and at a price which is not too high. I agree though we need some pace down the middle...

*three years

 

[perseus]

"We've got Tap in Sammy in our team"