jamie the seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 27, 2011
- 2,803
La Liga side Alaves make approach for Ulloa..SSN Reporting.
Haven't we got a sell on clause?
Argus reported vaguely in the summer that there might be a sell on clause:
http://www.theargus.co.uk/sport/14615401.Albion_set_for_windfall_if_striker_moves_on/
[MENTION=6886]Bozza[/MENTION] himself, on this very board, told us that there was a sell-on clause, and a couple of weeks later [MENTION=31]El Presidente[/MENTION] posted that he thought it was 15% or 20%
I'm certain that there is, but also fairly certain that it is not as high as 20%. 10% I believe, possibly 15%. However, that % of course ONLY relates to any portion of the fee ABOVE the price they paid us. Ergo, if we sold him for £10m, and they sell him on for £11m, our 10%sell-on bonus equates to £100k, not £1.1m. I doubt the club are budgeting to receive anything, if he goes back to Spain - highly unlikely that Alaves (or Almeria) would be paying that kind of money.
I'm certain that there is, but also fairly certain that it is not as high as 20%. 10% I believe, possibly 15%. However, that % of course ONLY relates to any portion of the fee ABOVE the price they paid us. Ergo, if we sold him for £10m, and they sell him on for £11m, our 10%sell-on bonus equates to £100k, not £1.1m. I doubt the club are budgeting to receive anything, if he goes back to Spain - highly unlikely that Alaves (or Almeria) would be paying that kind of money.
I had a dream 2 nights ago, Ulloa was in it..........am I on something.
Blue cheese late at night?
Except at Penalties.....Ulloa is much better than Hemed for me. Leo puts himself about and let's defenders know they are in a game. Ulloa had to lead the line on his own more often than not and had very little in support from a fellow striker. Leo with Baldock alongside him and our current wingers would score 25 goals a season IMO.
I'm certain that there is, but also fairly certain that it is not as high as 20%. 10% I believe, possibly 15%. However, that % of course ONLY relates to any portion of the fee ABOVE the price they paid us. Ergo, if we sold him for £10m, and they sell him on for £11m, our 10%sell-on bonus equates to £100k, not £1.1m. I doubt the club are budgeting to receive anything, if he goes back to Spain - highly unlikely that Alaves (or Almeria) would be paying that kind of money.
Except at Penalties.....
Is this a near enough 'fact' of all sell on clauses or do you just know it's the case on this one? Are there 2 different types? Reason I ask is I'd never hear this until now/recently as I always assumed a sell on clause was of the gross fee.
Whilst, in theory, two clubs can agree whatever terms they like in a deal, I'm pretty sure the standard practice is for the sell-on to apply to the profit only that the original buying club has made. I seem to remember that Insider on Ask The Club had given an answer to this effect a number of years ago, possibly in relation to the sale of Leon Knight.
haha granted. Not sure Ulloa's penalty has touched down yet
Whilst, in theory, two clubs can agree whatever terms they like in a deal, I'm pretty sure the standard practice is for the sell-on to apply to the profit only that the original buying club has made. I seem to remember that Insider on Ask The Club had given an answer to this effect a number of years ago, possibly in relation to the sale of Leon Knight.