Ulloa to Palace ?

[nwgull]

Ulloa will not be moving anywhere, Nothing story.

Can see Bridcutt moving on though.

This, I agree with: We can't let Ulloa go and expect to replace him until January at the earliest. Bridcutt could be replaced by what we already have, and the money we get for him could enable us to bring in some exciting new signings.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk 2

 

[Sam-]

Realistically we would find it hard to turn down 8 mil for Ulloa if we have a replacement lined up. Probably 3 mil for Bridcutt.
Realism.

 

[Vegas78]

Neither would get in our side, but it is good to know that we can take your best players whenever we want.

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Neither would get in our side, but it is good to know that we can take your best players whenever we want.

Except they'd both STROLL into your side. And we've said no, so obviously you can't.

Otherwise, that's a tremenduous post. Well done.

 

[Simster]

Neither would get in our side, but it is good to know that we can take your best players whenever we want.

Yeah obviously. Afterall, we only finished 3 points above you last season and they were only two of our best players.

So no chance they could get a game for you. Cock.

 

[seagullsovergrimsby]

Neither would get in our side, but it is good to know that we can take your best players whenever we want.

Ulloa makes Chamack look like a Sunday League striker

 

[piersa]

Don't bite!!!!!!!!!! The Palace trolls are having a field day

 

[Davemania]

We wanted him 12 months

Gus wanted him but Garvan is crap though choir boy

 

[TSB]

Except they'd both STROLL into your side. And we've said no, so obviously you can't.

Otherwise, that's a tremenduous post. Well done.

Any chance we can clear out some of these bellends today, Hans?

 

[Tyrone Biggums]

Neither would get in our side, but it is good to know that we can take your best players whenever we want.

I doubt many players would want to be in your side given you'll hardly win a game.

 

[Simster]

Any chance we can clear out some of these bellends today, Hans?

This. Please?

 

[Davemania]

We wanted him 12 months

Gus wanted him but Garvan is crap though choir boy

 

[albionite]

More calls to get these palace bellends off our threads and into their own little special room. Far to many tossers writing crap to get a bite so they can go back and report to bbs. Very tedious.

 

[Vegas78]

I doubt many players would want to be in your side given you'll hardly win a game.

Seriously players don't give a f@ck they just want money and Prem football. Which is a position we are in to offer both. We will go down, but we will surprise a few believe me

 

[piersa]

I have heard that Bridcutt is interested but only if he can have a limitless supply of fire retardant kit.

 

[seagullsovergrimsby]

Stop being Nigelphobic , they provide us with entertainment.

 

[albionite]

Stop being Nigelphobic , they provide us with entertainment.

The entertainment is boring now. None of them come up with something new or witty. Red n blue is there only decent poster, the rest come across as school kids.

 

[Couldn't Be Hyypia]

Hi Hans - I hope you can help. I've broken the "ignore" button on NSC because of this thread. I understand this won't be an issue after 11pm tonight but wondered if there is anything I can do in the meantime?

 

[churley1]

Shall we analyse that a little more closely, with respect to 'all parties'?

Palace; Ulloa's current value is probably about £6m. So unless you value Garvan at almost £3m, you'd financially be getting a VERY good deal. You'd also be getting a fabulous player, who might just help keep you up. Verdict: CORRECT

Brighton; Would be underselling Ulloa by at least £2m. Would be leaving the squad bereft of a single fit striker, ending any hope of challenging this season. And would be gaining an un-needed midfielder on wages higher than we would wish to pay for a squad player. Verdict: WRONG

Ulloa; Would be a quick step up in his career, but probably a short-lived one. The derisory value they've placed on him, might also be reflected in the wages they'd offer. A huge rise, but he might well do better, waiting for a proper Prem club in a year's time. Beyond the finances, Ulloa has settled in brilliantly, with Spanish speaking manager and coaching staff, and with a support structure of Spanish senior players around him. Would his football suffer if you replace that with Worzel Gummige and Paddy McCarthy. Who knows? Verdict: WRONG

Garvan; Would have to accept dropping a division, after starting the season as a regular in the Palace match-day squad. And would need to take a dip in wages, to move to a club where he'd struggle to get a start. Verdict: WRONG

So, not quite ALL parties, then?

That's all on the premise that the price was the same as that rumour which could have been plucked from thin air, I think most on here are over-valuing your players (like at most clubs) but a sizeable transfer fee (around 4.5 million) PLUS Garvan would definitely interest you.

I'm not all that bothered about Ulloa, a very good player on his day but that's why you'll fight to keep him. Very contrasting emotions for our clubs supporters on deadline day I'd imagine.

 

[Jukesy]

Double it seeing as you spent £8m on Gayle. Then add £2m as you're Palace.

Even then I'd hope we'd tell you to do one. Sell Leo and we are fecked.

He's played top flight before in Spain so I doubt he'd be desperate to jump ship to join a relegation battle. Keep firing as he is and a much bigger club will probably come along for him January so he may as well wait.

Why do you muppets keep going on about £8 million for Gayle

The fee for Gayle, who joined Peterborough from Dagenham & Redbridge in January for an initial £500,000, is understood to involve an initial down-payment of around £3.25m with a further £1.25m in add-ons.