Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Ulloa out tomorrow?



Zebedee

Anyone seen Florence?
Jul 8, 2003
8,052
Hangleton
Pack the midfield and get some of them to get forward. Use the likes of March and possibly Dickenson in midfield with Buckley as the main striker.

At least OG won't be able to drop Ince yet BG. That must be pleasing. :lol:
 




stss30

Registered User
Apr 24, 2008
9,546
So people expect us to get through the whole season with 2 (hopefully soon to be 3) strikers?

Why should the club rush out and get any striker this week? We have one game against a team at the bottom of the table on Saturday then a two week international break. It's obvious the best strikers will become available on deadline day. Unless you want us to get someone like Paynter again the club are doing exactly the right thing.
 


Perkino

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2009
6,053
Chelsea played Man Utd without a striker also Spain at Euro 2012 often had a rotating 6 midfielders instead of a recognised forward
 










hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,763
Chandlers Ford
Clearly Ulloa's prospective new club don't want him getting injured tomorrow and scuppering the deal.
 






Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,952
Surrey
Even shite teams in this league have a bloody ARRAY of forwards to choose from
Er, no.

Millwall have three strikers, all three of them are either injured or doubtful, and two of them are utter gash anyway:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23822610


The problem we have is that CMS is expensive and out for another month or two. It can't be easy to find a striker prepared to play occasionally for two months because lets face it, once CMS is fit he will be second choice or even third behind Barnes.
 






Napper

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
24,452
Sussex
Just highlights what a tight rope we are walking . Even a shit striker would be better than no striker
 


Hungry Joe

SINNEN
Oct 22, 2004
7,636
Heading for shore
Er, no.

Millwall have three strikers, all three of them are either injured or doubtful, and two of them are utter gash anyway:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23822610


The problem we have is that CMS is expensive and out for another month or two. It can't be easy to find a striker prepared to play occasionally for two months because lets face it, once CMS is fit he will be second choice or even third behind Barnes.

Indeed, and we've been very unlucky with Hoskins. Decent strikers are notoriously expensive, so I'm guessing the development squad strikers/attacking midfielders/utility players are a better bet than another Barn Door Billy until such a time as we have our main strikers fit and/or can add someone of real value.
 








hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,763
Chandlers Ford
Just highlights what a tight rope we are walking . Even a shit striker would be better than no striker



Disagree. Rather have a GOOD midfielder playing out of position, than a SHIT striker. What's the point in carrying rubbish players in your squad, who are only EVER going to play in an emergency?
 


Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,785
GOSBTS
Naylor saying that OG was referring to ORLANDI, not ULLOA during the press conference this morning.
 






Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,952
Surrey
Just highlights what a tight rope we are walking . Even a shit striker would be better than no striker
I'm not sure that's true. If we're going to play a shit, ineffective loan striker then I think I'd rather we just gave a run out to someone in the development squad.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here