S'hampton Seagull
Well-known member
I would, but your argument assumes we have an amount set aside to spend. I'm not so sure we do.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Ulloa out for "2 months"
- Thread starter elwheelio
- Start date
I would, but your argument assumes we have an amount set aside to spend. I'm not so sure we do.
symyjym
Banned
We are also not sure that we don't, and if we have, we would be better off spending it in January rather than the last transfer window?
kevtherev
Well-known member
Why does anyone think there is money to spend
The budget is the same as last season. Those who have gone have been replaced, like for like(wages wise anyway) and Upson will be on loads more than the percentage we were paying Stoke. Poyet had already spent his pennies. No one has been sold and no one of any note has been bought. So we are working on the same budget. No one has for one second said there is more to spend. People expecting money to be spent, I think are going to be disappointed, unless of course someone goes to free up some cash to work with.... now who have we got who is worth a few quid and probably surplus to requirements with the additions that have been made We may have three strikers injured but their wages are still being paid every mouth and included in the playing budget.
The budget is the same as last season. Those who have gone have been replaced, like for like(wages wise anyway) and Upson will be on loads more than the percentage we were paying Stoke. Poyet had already spent his pennies. No one has been sold and no one of any note has been bought. So we are working on the same budget. No one has for one second said there is more to spend. People expecting money to be spent, I think are going to be disappointed, unless of course someone goes to free up some cash to work with.... now who have we got who is worth a few quid and probably surplus to requirements with the additions that have been made We may have three strikers injured but their wages are still being paid every mouth and included in the playing budget.
symyjym
Banned
Why does anyone think there is money to spend
But you don't know what we have got, and last season we splashed out £2m on Ulloa, so I expect at least that amount plus a bit more in the kitty.
On the basis that you think Barnes missed a sitter by 6ft I cannot believe anything you say in your post has any factual evidence of the funds we have or not, or what will be made available come January or when Oscar says he needs it.
kevtherev
Well-known member
You right, I have no idea what we got. All i'm going on is the club saying the playing budget is the same as last season. In order for someone to come in, someone is going to have to inject more cash into that budget.
S'hampton Seagull
Well-known member
Don't get me wrong, I hope your right, I really do. I think our current injury list masks the fact we have a number of big earners at the club and there may not be as much spare cash as you think
symyjym
Banned
But we haven't spent our budget yet to need a cash injection
Albumen
Don't wait for me!
A winger who when plays up front on his own gets a hattrick (albeit for the under 21s), yes.
kevtherev
Well-known member
If it's the same squad as last season on the same wages, then the playing budget is the same, is it not
Same being spent out this season as last = same budget. In order to bring players in we would either need a) A bigger budget or b) Sell someone to fund it.
symyjym
Banned
You may be right, I'm just thinking along the lines that we haven't purchased any players yet. I wonder if FFP takes into account losses through injury.
Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
If the budget is the same as last year, I'd say we've spent it and a bit more. We may have signed Ulloa but we sold Noone for close to what we paid for him to cover it. We may have sold someone else but I forget who. So with the players released and the new signings we have made I wouldn't think there's anything but buttons left....sadly
I can't imagine releasing Vicente, Harley, Dicker, Adjestien and Painter and saving the wages we paid Bridge was costing us anymore than Agustien, Ward, Andrews, Conway, and Upson in wages. In fact I reckon we are probably paying more in wages this year
Dobbie probably cost us close to what we got for him in signing on fees and wages, so I'd discount him.
Last edited:
If it's the same squad as last season on the same wages, then the playing budget is the same, is it not
But it isn't is it? We paid a transfer fees for Ulloa last season and didn't we get about 800k for Dobbie this season?
kevtherev
Well-known member
I would imagine Upson's signing on fee and his wages take care of the Dobbie money. Upson must be one of the highest earners at the club easily.
symyjym
Banned
If it's the same squad as last season on the same wages, then the playing budget is the same, is it not
No because you are not taking into account that last season in the January window we spent £2m on Ulloa with our budget. Likewise it is also reasonable to assume that money will be there if needed in this season's January window.
symyjym
Banned
If the budget is the same as last year, I'd say we've spent it and a bit more. We may have signed Ulloa but we sold Noone for close to what we paid for him to cover it. We may have sold someone else but I forget who. So with the players released and the new signings we have made I wouldn't think there's anything but buttons left....sadly
I can't imagine releasing Vicente, Harley, Dicker, Adjestien and Painter and saving the wages we paid Bridge was costing us anymore than Agustien, Ward, Andrews, Conway, and Upson in wages. In fact I reckon we are probably paying more in wages this year
Dobbie probably cost us close to what we got for him in signing on fees and wages, so I'd discount him.
I wouldn't disagree with your scenario. The point I was originally on was all the comments saying that Burke and Barber were pulling the strings and that Oscar didn't have a say in who we get, and that he should have been given a pile of money and the club should not be such tight arses.
I am saying that come January Oscar will know what he needs, and January is a better time to spend than when he arrived when he had no real knowledge of what he has.
kevtherev
Well-known member
What's funny
....Thinking a ex international player, who has played at the highest level almost his whole career and with several clubs after him. Would sign on for less than a 5 figure sum and be on less than £15/20k a week. Now that's funny.
Jimmy Grimble
Well-known member
I'm not sure how it affects each years budget/accounts, but the Ulloa transfer money is being paid in installments, so we are still paying some of that this year.
Great player but his height is no use. Standing still and jumping up, Will hardly gets off the ground. I believe from ground to feet he managed 37cm, about the worst in the squad including the U16's. Kaz jumped the highest from this position, almost twice as high as Will off the ground.
So by my calculations, Kaz is about 4 inches smaller than Will, but from a standing position he would be about 8 inches above Will.