Dave the OAP
Well-known member
Can you summarise what happened?
Political Status quo = good
Farridge and ukip= racist bigotted single issue charletons
That was about it
Can you summarise what happened?
I'd say anyone who wanted some work done on their house on time, at a fair price and by someone who is competent and takes pride in their work. I know there are good British tradesmen ( such as our [MENTION=26105]Soulman[/MENTION]), but there are too many rip off merchants.
If people want protectionism by voting UKIP then fine, but accept the economic consequences that come with it.
really ,when things picked up in poland a lot of them went back, lots of students flooded over for casual seasonal work , it was all based on money making on the cheap
regards
DR
Can you summarise what happened?
If anyone seriously thinks UKIP and Farage are electable after the stunning double standards on Panorama tonight then they are seriously deluded and wasting a vote.
If anyone seriously thinks UKIP and Farage are electable after the stunning double standards on Panorama tonight then they are seriously deluded and wasting a vote.
Well, I did say earlier that they were stable, you said they were fluid. I was using Labour policy as a benchmark, y'know like how they are now going to be tough on immigration to the UK but are working tirelessly to get Turkey into the EU. I'm sure that will work.
As for the light bulbs, I will replace this with banning barometers if that livens it up, there is so much madness from our unelected masters to choose from isn't there?
http://www.theguardian.com/politics.../cameron-dig-brussels-diabetes-discriminatory
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...claim-that-water-can-prevent-dehydration.html
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:1994R2257:20060217:EN:PDF
Have you made a single post on this thread about UKIP's stable policies? I can't find one……
As much as I dislike UKIP, I do sort of applaud their stance on the BBC. That Panorama programme certainly had things to say, but half of it was entirely irrelevant.
So whilst UKIP drawing €70m from the European taxpayer and rarely turning up to parliament IS in the public interest, along with the fact that Farage whinges incessantly about British fishing quotas whilst having by far the WORST attendance record of all MEPs in the fisheries commission, I really don't care about him being a "bully" to fellow party members, and being rude to other people he holds in contempt. The latter smelt strongly of a hatchet job.
And lets face it, the BBC have form for propping up the establishment. My particular bug bear is the Royal family, but even ignoring that, I don't recall them running a show where Gordon Brown's bullying reputation was scrutinised. And they never bothered calling to account absurd pro Unionist Xenophobe, Iain Paisley when he shamefully yelled at the Pope during a parliament session. So why does Farage deserve this treatment?
"slightly uncomfortable"!!! He goes on and on at the EU for giving Britain a small slice of channel fisheries, but can't be arsed to attend the fishing commission EVER?Agreed. Even as a UKIP supporter I'm slightly uncomfortable with Farage's lack of attendance. When it comes to the 70m Euros I'm less bothered. It helps fund UKIP - there's a sweet irony about EU money funding an anti-EU party.
Panaroma did appear to be a poorly put together hatchet job just repeating previous claims. There was little substance and evidence offered. I look forward to similar programmes about the other parties .... or are they now protected by the BBC ?
A few years back i worked alongside a Czech sparks, his wage back home was less in a month than he could earn here in a week. Save send the cash home, buy a house outright within 5 years.........job done.
And lets face it, the BBC have form for propping up the establishment. My particular bug bear is the Royal family, but even ignoring that, I don't recall them running a show where Gordon Brown's bullying reputation was scrutinised.
Panaroma did appear to be a poorly put together hatchet job just repeating previous claims. There was little substance and evidence offered. I look forward to similar programmes about the other parties .... or are they now protected by the BBC ?
Agreed. Even as a UKIP supporter I'm slightly uncomfortable with Farage's lack of attendance. When it comes to the 70m Euros I'm less bothered. It helps fund UKIP - there's a sweet irony about EU money funding an anti-EU party.
What's the answer for everyone, carry on with three same useless parties over and over again. We need a new direction.
Yeah, let's vote for the party with a load of ex-tories in it, funded by a load of ex-tory donors. What a revolution….
Panorama have gone after the 'establishment' in the past, I've just picked a few out…
Blair the neo-conservative
Secrets of the Tory Billionaire
Hacking: Power, Corruption and Lies
There are plenty more if you go through the archive.
Yeah, let's vote for the party with a load of failed ex-tories in it, funded by a load of ex-tory donors. What a revolution….
That's the thing isn't it? There are a few genuine alternative parties, UKIP aren't one of them. They are are more of the same