BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 18,201
Many a dictator and failed politician has dined out on that one ...............................
Have they?
Doesn't make it any less true.
Many a dictator and failed politician has dined out on that one ...............................
I'll take Hastings Gulls opinion over yours .
Doesn't make it any less true.
Jesus wept youre actually serious ?? if it was that '' safe ,dry and as warm as can be'' , they'd stay there themselves , they obviously arent in a life or death situation, if it wasnt , they'd take their wife and kids with them.
Jesus wept youre actually serious ?? if it was that '' safe ,dry and as warm as can be'' , they'd stay there themselves , they obviously arent in a life or death situation, if it wasnt , they'd take their wife and kids with them.
One photo can be made to appear that way, but having watched the news in the last few days, there are many many women, and children at Budapest station.
Jeeeeez in what way, it means very little it is nonsensical ....
My point still stands , a few do gooders is not representative of the general consensus of the population.
while i agree a picture can include and exclude what you want, it has been conspicous from many images across many news outlets that there's an awful lot of young men trying to get on the trains at Budapest. the TV pictures try to show more women and children but again notably individuals rather than as part of large hetergenous crowd. we need to start being more honest about this, after travelling through half a dozen countries, those migrants at Budapest are economic migrants, no longer refugees. they have had several opportunities to make asylum claims along the way. as one put it "here (Hungary) there is nothing, in Germany it is good.".
I really don't think it needs any explaining. I am sure you can think back to some things that were popular and at the same time wrong.
I'll start you off
Nazism
Slavery
Religion
Pop Idol
while i agree a picture can include and exclude what you want, it has been conspicous from many images across many news outlets that there's an awful lot of young men trying to get on the trains at Budapest. the TV pictures try to show more women and children but again notably individuals rather than as part of large hetergenous crowd. we need to start being more honest about this, after travelling through half a dozen countries, those migrants at Budapest are economic migrants, no longer refugees. they have had several opportunities to make asylum claims along the way. as one put it "here (Hungary) there is nothing, in Germany it is good.".
My god, do I really need to counter your irrelevant list with the opposites ........
I'm still waiting for a video that asks the questions, why England. I'm talking about the people at Calais.
They could probably claim Asylum in France today, but they don't want too. They would rather live in poor conditions, freezing cold temperatures for months on end and take the chance every night. When did France turn in to such a bad country?
Exactly.This is far too simplistic, as you well know. Of course these people need help, and I have said several times, that Europe will probably will take the ones we have now, as there is little alternative. People are not making excuses to make themselves better; they are simply being rather more realistic than you. The comparison with your granddad is utterly irrelevant - so did my dad in the Desert War against Rommel (can't mention my mum -she always said that she was on the other side!) -what possible use is this to the present debate.
The fact is that for most folk in the UK, the future of mass immigration is worrying. Though it is swept under the carpet, there is a gradual simmering of, if not discontent, certainly an element of "separateness" Having even more will only increase this divide. Muslim extremism is slowly growing and it is clear that racial discrimination is not a thing of the past, though perhaps thankfully not as naked as say 50 years ago. The country will inevitably find it harder to cope, infrastructure-wise, and the millions of immigrants here will not find it easy to fulfil their dream, thus increasing their frustrations and consequent suspicions that they are second class citizens. Precisely this was mooted as one of the reasons for the radicalisation of the two fanatics who murdered the publishers in France. For the record, yes, Europe will take the numbers we have in the continent, but after that a clear and unequivocal message is sent that the military will step in, and return all immigrants. There will be heart-rending scenes, certainly initially, but if the message gets through, then hopefully the boats will not set sail nearly to the same extent. Sad, but would you bet against it. People going to Munich station to hand out blankets are not going to want to take blankets every year for the next 20 years, say, once the novelty wears off and the likelihood of civil strife increases, if it had not already been evident.
This has to stop, if by force, then need be. Perhaps your grandchildren, watching scenes of disorder in European cities, might ask why you let such numbers in when you had been warned.
I'm still waiting for a video that asks the questions, why England. I'm talking about the people at Calais.
They could probably claim Asylum in France today, but they don't want too. They would rather live in poor conditions, freezing cold temperatures for months on end and take the chance every night. When did France turn in to such a bad country?
France already has more asylum seekers than Britain. Some of the 3000 already have relatives here (or in Canada as my previous post) If you can speak English, then Britain is more likely to have work.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/da...-eu-countries-receive-the-most-asylum-seekers