In order of "what have they done for us" I'm putting UEFA some way below the Romans (not to be confused with AS Roma).What have UEFA ever done for us ?
In order of "what have they done for us" I'm putting UEFA some way below the Romans (not to be confused with AS Roma).What have UEFA ever done for us ?
Oh, they're not doing them for the queen stuff?Kindly be informed that proceedings have been opened against AS Roma with the following charges:
- Blocking of public passageways - Art. 38 SSR
- Throwing of objects - Art. 16(2)(b) DR
- Lighting of fireworks - Art. 16(2)(c) DR
- Provocative message of an offensive and political nature - Art. 16(2)(e) DR
The UEFA Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body will take a decision on this case in due course.
UEFA Media & Public Relations
UEFA
Route de Genève 46
if you ever get the time or inclination go and watch a game in Morocco .....stewards...It shouldn't need that though, should it?
And the stewarding numbers told a very clear tale as to who they were focused on.
There was a solid line of stewards from top to bottom on our right, probably 60-70 or so in total. On the Roma side of the barrier there was a single solitary steward.
bottom lineOh, they're not doing them for the queen stuff?
In Marseille, they did put nets across front of section too which did obscure view, but down the away section in Roma was a narrowing wedge shape snd just down sides only may not have affected to much the match view, while limiting ability to lob stuff at our fans?Whilst I agree with you on a practical, logical point of you, despite the content, it was really nice to not have to watch the Albion through a net in Europe.
Good point, didn't think of the beer sellers, who were mostly fine, but really unnecessary during the match. Thankfully, I didn't bother leaving my seat until it was all flowing so missed the lining up. I did wonder looking down what on earth you were supposed to do if you really needed a piss.I've taken it to mean the beer sellers blocking the stairs and the stewards and police lining us up on the stairs and concourse instead of holding us either on the flat road or in our seats.
Don't disagree about the poor stewarding and security.It shouldn't need that though, should it?
And the stewarding numbers told a very clear tale as to who they were focused on.
There was a solid line of stewards from top to bottom on our right, probably 60-70 or so in total. On the Roma side of the barrier there was a single solitary steward.
I thought it meant at the end when we held an hour and everyone decided it would be a good idea to queue in the stairwells (no doubt after Marseille bus fiasco) but thus blocking exits or any chance of getting to/from the loos?I've taken it to mean the beer sellers blocking the stairs and the stewards and police lining us up on the stairs and concourse instead of holding us either on the flat road or in our seats.
Showed Ipswich Town a thing or two, IMO.I'm a bit disappointed the Queen Gives Blow Jobs banner has been reported. I rather liked that.
That's what the second part of my post was referring to.I thought it meant at the end when we held an hour and everyone decided it would be a good idea to queue in the stairwells (no doubt after Marseille bus fiasco) but thus blocking exits or any chance of getting to/from the loos?
Likewise stayed in seat until moving, but in answer to your question!Good point, didn't think of the beer sellers, who were mostly fine, but really unnecessary during the match. Thankfully, I didn't bother leaving my seat until it was all flowing so missed the lining up. I did wonder looking down what on earth you were supposed to do if you really needed a piss.
Quite. Succint, and to the point.Showed Ipswich Town a thing or two, IMO.
I thought Barber alluded to another banner held up by one person (he said THE person holding it not a row) when interviewed on TalkSportI'm a bit disappointed the Queen Gives Blow Jobs banner has been reported. I rather liked that.
He also said "homophobic' and I'm not sure how the Queen banner could be classed as that, so Id guess your "other" banner assumption is correct?I maybe wrong but I thought the offensive
I thought Barber alluded to another banner held up by one person (he said THE person holding it not a row) when interviewed on TalkSport
Im still not sure which queen it referred to. Was it the old one or the queen consortI'm a bit disappointed the Queen Gives Blow Jobs banner has been reported. I rather liked that.