Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] UEFA change FFP rules because of Chelsea



Mellor 3 Ward 4

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2004
10,204
saaf of the water
Quickly adds up

750k a week for Felix
100k for Mudryk
150 for Havertx
150 of sterling

etc etc
And Sterling's contract is for 5 years!

Flip side of this is that Chelsea do have a history of selling for big money too - Hazard, Oscar and Morata are just three I can think of in recent years.
 




Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,725
GOSBTS
Quickly adds up

750k a week for Felix
100k for Mudryk
150 for Havertx
150 of sterling

etc etc
They made about £45M of player sales in the summer, as well as covering Lukakus loan fee. All helps
 


raymondo

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2017
7,114
Wiltshire
It's not going to change anything much, is it? So they can spread the cost over five rather than eight years. Not a massive difference really.
but it could have been a green light to spreading transfer fees over 8, 10, 12...years maybe
 


Lurchy

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2014
2,421
Quickly adds up

750k a week for Felix
100k for Mudryk
150 for Havertx
150 of sterling

etc etc

Sterling is believed to be on 325k a week.

The wages are ludicrous at Chelsea. They need to qualify for Champions League for next 4 seasons and go quite far otherwise they’re going to have major financial issues.
 






mejonaNO12 aka riskit

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2003
21,865
England
A reactive move.

Horrible that Chelsea will get away with something nobody else will be able to

Or you can look at it as Chelsea have needlessly handed out 8 year contracts to players they may not want in 3 years time and then laugh and laugh and laugh
 


Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
68,966
Withdean area
It's not going to change anything much, is it? So they can spread the cost over five rather than eight years. Not a massive difference really.
On £0.5b of transfers all on 8 year contracts, just as an example, it would increase their FFP costs and annual accounts losses by £37.5m.

In addition, it nips this practice to circumvent FFP in the bud for all clubs planning to do it.
 
Last edited:






raymondo

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2017
7,114
Wiltshire
Sterling is believed to be on 325k a week.

The wages are ludicrous at Chelsea. They need to qualify for Champions League for next 4 seasons and go quite far otherwise they’re going to have major financial issues.
They need to sell a lot of shirts...maybe Mudryk pays for himself 🤔
 


warmleyseagull

Well-known member
Apr 17, 2011
4,374
Beaminster, Dorset
Well done UEFA. All they need do now is enforce these rules unflinchingly. IMO, there is a chance that these regs will bite enough that mega transfers don't happen; it could actually be a bit of a leveller.
 


southstandandy

WEST STAND ANDY
Jul 9, 2003
6,026
But by doing what Chelsea are doing, is effectively pre-spending money in advance over the next few transfer windows.

Yes, it means they can get a load of players in now, but by doing this with so many of their signings, how much will then be available for them to spend next summer, or the summer after that? Might look good now, but it's probable their fans will be moaning in a couple of years because they can't go out and spend huge wads as much of their spending will already have been accounted for.
 






Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,319
Why ? Anyone could have done it. Quite clever to be honest
Because ‘anyone’ don’t have such ridiculous amounts of money that they can just put off a contract of x million and put their finances at risk giving silly contracts. Can’t you see what they are doing is loop hole cheating due to gross spending power and against all ethics? You’re really sticking up for the disgusting way Chelsea Football Club operate? Even many of their own actual fans don’t do that and acknowledge it’s wrong!
 


Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,319
And Sterling's contract is for 5 years!

Flip side of this is that Chelsea do have a history of selling for big money too - Hazard, Oscar and Morata are just three I can think of in recent years.
Yes but there’s way way way more players who have failed and just been paid off hugely expensive contracts. I wouldnt say they have a good history of player deals at all - see Drinkwater, De Bruyne, Salah and Lukaku to name just a few of their f*** ups in many different ways - horrible club that does nothing but damage football.
 




Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,725
GOSBTS
Because ‘anyone’ don’t have such ridiculous amounts of money that they can just put off a contract of x million and put their finances at risk giving silly contracts. Can’t you see what they are doing is loop hole cheating due to gross spending power and against all ethics? You’re really sticking up for the disgusting way Chelsea Football Club operate? Even many of their own actual fans don’t do that and acknowledge it’s wrong!
Mudryks contract is £100k a week allegedly, which isn’t that outrageous. And I would disagree it’s a ‘loophole’ because there was never a rule. Just no one ever did it. All it’s done is allowed them to pay inflated transfer fees - one of which we benefited from.

It’s good that UEFA have now put something in place though, as a bit naive it didn’t exist before. Similar to how HMRC would allow a company to write off a laptop or something
 






A mex eyecan

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2011
3,803




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here