Uddersfield v Norwich

[perseus]

Keith Stroud knows why ?

Brighton v QPR
PS: Ollie unhappy with Keith Stroud over decision to dismiss captain Nedum Onuoha

 

[Simster]

Paalce 1-1

Sent from my P9000 using Tapatalk

Swans and Hull both winning. Come on Stains, let's get the Nigels back where they belong and ensure that fluke at the weekend counts for NOTHING.

 

[Ernest]

What is going on at Hull ? 3-2 to them , Boro scored TWICE

 

[saafend_seagull]

What is going on at Hull ? 3-2 to them , Boro scored TWICE

TEN PERCENT of their total goals.

Sent from my P9000 using Tapatalk

 

[BensGrandad]

No, that's not the case. Here are the rules regarding encroachment by players on the penalty takers team:

If one or more of kicker's teammates infringe the above procedure, then

if a goal is scored, the penalty kick is retaken.
if a goal is not scored, an indirect free kick is awarded to the opponents from where the infringement occurred, ie. where the kicker's teammate entered the penalty area or penalty arc.

Which is what I said and what happened Keith Stroud was absolutely correct.

 

[pasty]

H-t 0-0

 

[CorgiRegisteredFriend]

So far so very good.

 

[KVLT]

Newcastle commentary:

"The officiating in this division. We've spoken about it so often. You think you're getting used to it, and then....."

 

[perseus]

Referees are conspiring against Toon. Still 0-0 at HT.

 

[sams dad]

Which is what I said and what happened Keith Stroud was absolutely correct.

Stroud was NOT correct, the penalty should have been retaken.

 

[beardy gull]

Which is what I said and what happened Keith Stroud was absolutely correct.

No, it's not what you said. The correct decision according to the laws quoted is a re-taken penalty.

 

[Lady Whistledown]

https://twitter.com/mitiozo/status/849703372953354240

Watch this again. Watch the ball very closely as Ritchie goes to kick. I *think* it moves just before his kicking foot strikes the ball, i.e. that he's somehow managed to accidentally knock it with his other foot. I keep watching it and I'm not 100% sure, but there might just be the smallest hint of movement.

IF that's the case, once he's knocked it with his non-kicking foot, he cannot, under the laws of the game, touch the ball again until another player has touched it. Therefore as soon as he hits it into the net, he's committed an indirect free-kick offence.

I can't believe a professional referee and his assistants would ALL get the laws wrong if it was disallowed for encroachment, surely (if a penalty is scored following encroachment from the attacking side, then it's obviously supposed to be a retake)? There has to be something else going on.

 

[El Turi]

I can't see Norwich holding out. They're terrible! Pritchard in particular has been awful. Thank god he chose to sign for them over us.

 

[Louis MacNeice]

Which is what I said and what happened Keith Stroud was absolutely correct.

But that wasn't what you said...you might have meant to say it, but it definitely wasn't what you said.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice

 

[BensGrandad]

If a Newcastle player encroaches either way it is an offense by them so a kick is given to Burton where the offense occurred. Most refs only bring this in the player scores the penalty If a Burton player encroaches and Newcastle score the goal stands if it is missed or saved the kick is retaken. If you order the kick to be retaken when a Newcastle player encroaches they not penalised and have a 2nd chance.

 

[Hugo Rune]

Keith Stroud was absolutely correct.

You may very well be the only person (other than Stroud himself) in the country who believes that decision was correct (if it was for encroachment).

For that I salute you.

Comment of the season from you!

 

[perseus]

If the referee gives the signal for a penalty kick
to be taken and, before the ball is in play, one of
the following situations occurs:
The player taking the penalty kick infringes
the Laws of the Game:
• The referee allows the kick to proceed.
• If the ball enters the goal, the kick is retaken.
• If the ball does not enter the goal, the referee
stops play and restarts the match with an
indirect free kick, from the place where the
infringement occurred, to the defending team.

If the referee gives the signal for a penalty kick
to be taken and, before the ball is in play, one of
the following situations occurs:
A team-mate of the player taking the kick
infringes the Laws of the Game:
• The referee allows the kick to proceed.
• If the ball enters the goal, the kick is retaken

 

[dazzer6666]

Not if it was a Newcastle player encroaching the correct award is a free kick to Burton. Ifa Burton player encroaches and the kick is missed or saved then it is retaken

Wrong

Which is what I said and what happened Keith Stroud was absolutely correct.

Also wrong

 

[Driver8]

Which is what I said and what happened Keith Stroud was absolutely correct.

No, it is the opposite of what you said.

 

[sams dad]

If a Newcastle player encroaches and the penalty is scored it is a free kick to Burton if It was missed or saved the kick is retaken. If a Burton player encroaches and Newcastle score the goal stands if it is missed or saved the kick is retaken. If you order the kick to be retaken when a Newcastle player encroaches they not penalised and have a 2nd chance.

Why can't you accept that you got it wrong?
The rule is simple: If the kicker's team- mate encroaches and a goal is scored, the correct decision is a retaken penalty.