Worrying that the referee, linesmen, 4th official all got it wrong.
Well they probably decided it wasn't a penalty in the first place, then got confused.
Worrying that the referee, linesmen, 4th official all got it wrong.
Did you just make that rumour up? ^^
Webber had done the job needed for us (found us Wagner and supported the strategy that has got us here), still was weird timing for him to leave when he did like. Our next DoF will be a similar appointment.
I always thought that the free kick was given for any infringement by the attacking side and a retake if by the the defending side. To me that seems the logical action rather than give the attacking side a 2nd bite at the cherry, having offended. I wonder if in the light of this innocent mistake FIFA will look at the rule and possibly amend it.
As regards a left back we have no need as we have our No1 Bong back. Just hope he will suffice next season in The Premier.
Bless you BG. We all make mistakes.I have just read FIFA Rule 14 page 8 (sorry cant copy and paste) but basically I have got this wrong after all these years
That's also wrong if the defending side commits the infringement and the attacking team had scored - the goal stands, not retaken.I always thought that the free kick was given for any infringement by the attacking side and a retake if by the the defending side.
Hudds fans being a bit chippy again and rightly so after a decent performance.
Can easy see them averaging 2ppg now they have Hogg ( who for some reason is ranked alongside Messi every time one of them speaks) back.
Jonathon?
He's a terrible player - worse than Lloyd Samuel. Don't encourage him FFS.
I always thought that the free kick was given for any infringement by the attacking side and a retake if by the the defending side. To me that seems the logical action rather than give the attacking side a 2nd bite at the cherry, having offended. I wonder if in the light of this innocent mistake FIFA will look at the rule and possibly amend it.
As regards a left back we have no need as we have our No1 Bong back. Just hope he will suffice next season in The Premier.
Easy game against Forest A but then they have, successively, PNE H(still outside PO chance) , Derby A (resurgent), Fulham H (PO contenders, 2nd best away team in league) Wolves A (found mojo). Eight points from those four games would be impressive. Likely to win their last two games so could still make 91 points, but think they are likely to slip up somewhere. 90 points still looks enough to me.
You do make me chuckle BG. You've been getting it wrong for 60 years, a pro ref makes a daft mistake once and you think FIFA will change the rules. [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
It has highlighted the fault in the rule as Matt Ritchie would have had a 2nd chance after a Newcastle player breaking the rule as it stands now. Surely it must be wrong that they could gain such an advantage.
It's not an advantage to have to retake a penalty if you scored it is it? You may miss the next time.
If you do miss it first time then the free kick is given to the opposition so you don't get the chance to retake it.
Why is this so difficult to understand?
Mooy is our Messi! Hogg our Makelele. Get it right.Hudds fans being a bit chippy again and rightly so after a decent performance.
Can easy see them averaging 2ppg now they have Hogg ( who for some reason is ranked alongside Messi every time one of them speaks) back.
Would take them to 88 so we'd need 2 wins.
Good chance we will need to win away somewhere though.
Wouldn't want to lose Friday and go into resurgent Wolves looking over our shoulders more than we are already.
All to play for still despite the champagne corks on here yesterday.
It's not an advantage to have to retake a penalty if you scored it is it? You may miss the next time.
If you do miss it first time then the free kick is given to the opposition so you don't get the chance to retake it.
Why is this so difficult to understand?
I think one thing that penalty fiasco has shown is that referee's have been consistently LAX on the rules - its literally once in a blue moon you ever see a retake for encroachment, yet just about EVERY penalty I see has players of both sides encroaching before the ball is struck.
I can also recall Nicky Forster having a penalty saved at Withdean once where the keeper had dashed about 6 yards off his line and beaten it away. No retake, the "save" stood and everyone played on. Absolutely ridiculous when you consider the ref and his assistant are supposed to be specifically watching for those type of offences.
It seems anything goes. If this farcical incident goes some way towards tightening the rules on penalties then its not before time. Players have been taking the piss for years.