Booooo .......
I wonder how much money changed hands for that decision ?
I wonder how much money changed hands for that decision ?
Booooo .......
I wonder how much money changed hands for that decision ?
They can still operate whilst they appeal I think
FFS. Nothing we like more than halting progress in this country.
Country or city?
http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/16197107.Uber_licence_revoked_in_Brighton_and_Hove/
"The decision was unanimous with some interesting reasons given, such as no wheelchair access vehicles and failure to recruit Brighton based drivers.
The licensing panel of Councillor Jacqui O'Quinn (Lab), Councillor Lynda Hyde (Con) and Councillor Lizzie Deane (Green), interrogated the speakers.
None of the three councillors has the Uber app or has ever hailed an Uber."[/I]
Wow, nothing like having a council panel who are open to the idea of Uber!!!
It will be interesting to see what the Nsc cabbies think of this.
Probably a good job considering the data breach.
It will be interesting to see what the Nsc cabbies think of this.
So this only relates to B&H Hackney/Private licence Uber, if they are licensed elsewhere (say Adur) then they can carry on operating in the city. Needless to say the council reasoning to revoke is dubious, they point to a data breach of Uber's data back in 2016 and say that due to this Uber are "not a fit and proper entity to hold such a licence". I wonder if they have carried out stress testing on the other local firms to see if their databases hold up to a attempted hack (I doubt very much a local firm would have the same security protocols as Uber!!!). In my opinion this is just an excuse for the council to buckle under the pressure that local taxi firm's are applying to them. Uber provides a safe and reliable alternative to local firms for many people and is very useful for tourists visiting the city who want a recognisable firm to get them from A-B. Its the public's choice to chose who they want to use not the councils, the council should embrace firms like Uber, not reject them!
I wonder if the council will close down our local GP surgeries then?? https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/17/security-breach-fears-26-million-nhs-patients/
Good. Don't like Uber. Never used it, doubt I ever will. Same with Air B&B. No time for these new-fangled ideas. We managed just fine without them.
So this only relates to B&H Hackney/Private licence Uber, if they are licensed elsewhere (say Adur) then they can carry on operating in the city. Needless to say the council reasoning to revoke is dubious, they point to a data breach of Uber's data back in 2016 and say that due to this Uber are "not a fit and proper entity to hold such a licence". I wonder if they have carried out stress testing on the other local firms to see if their databases hold up to a attempted hack (I doubt very much a local firm would have the same security protocols as Uber!!!). In my opinion this is just an excuse for the council to buckle under the pressure that local taxi firm's are applying to them. Uber provides a safe and reliable alternative to local firms for many people and is very useful for tourists visiting the city who want a recognisable firm to get them from A-B. Its the public's choice to chose who they want to use not the councils, the council should embrace firms like Uber, not reject them!