swansea were the better team
Really? Thought it was pretty good, pitch didn't help (bobbles everywhere) and it was interesting to see how Swansea play at youth/ds level.
Really. We didn't have a shot on target, in fact in the second half I don't think we had a shot. Hoskin's sole contribution in the second half was to take two throw ins. The supply to him was non existent. Kemy not even going to play himself into contention for a regular berth in the stiffs based on that performance. Triallists - meh.
He is ours...he has not played for any other league team...lives Hailsham. Believe his father had a trial for Albion...good player but did not get a contract,but there again, neither did Ian Wright...rejected for being too lightweight...some you win,some you lose...Wasn't March with us then released so went to Lewes and we re-signed him from there? Probably okay to count him as our product.
He is ours...he has not played for any other league team...lives Hailsham. Believe his father had a trial for Albion...good player but did not get a contract,but there again, neither did Ian Wright...rejected for being too lightweight...some you win,some you lose...
He is ours...he has not played for any other league team...lives Hailsham. Believe his father had a trial for Albion...good player but did not get a contract,but there again, neither did Ian Wright...rejected for being too lightweight...some you win,some you lose...
Sounds like trouble to me!
Jeffrey Monakana looks like he has potential, lightning pace and put in a couple decent crosses.
they could have called him Mike!
I think the most important department, now, is the youth academy. Infact I think it is more important than getting into the Premier League, for the simple reason that if we get it right, it is most probably the only part of the club that could make money.
If you look at Southampton in the last 9 years they have sold Walcott, Bale, and Oxlade Chamberlain for £27 million. The new academy system states that an elite level academy should pay about £3 million a year to run, that means they have broken even, but now they have Luke Shaw, who is touted around at £20 million+. A lot of Premiership clubs loose money.
So even if Hunte has a question mark over his attitude, I think if he is as good as he sounded a year ago, then he is worth the gamble.
So even if Hunte has a question mark over his attitude, I think if he is as good as he sounded a year ago, then he is worth the gamble.
Hunte looked very poor and very unfit. Not sure where he has been training recently.
Its not a gamble, an inevitability more like.
I dont like to comment directly on this young player, I dont know him, but if we take the general view of young players with bad attitude then clubs should stay well clear.
We are not talking about the skulking International players that excite us and offer regular moments of magic, or a young player that strolls around in first team games scoring from nothing and saving his manager from the sack whilst becoming the fans cult hero.
We are talking about a young kid that has not earned his first pro contract, allegedly partly for his poor attitude at a club that would likely forgive for a season or two if they thought he had some high level talent.
The real gamble is how might our current young players feel when they are suddenly sidelined for last nights game, those that train hard, commit themselves in the hope of progression within our Academy, if you bring triallists in then ensure they have the attributes deserving of those exclusion.
Look beyond their Premier League Academy status, scout properly !!!
I know what you mean. An academy full of teenagers with egos way above their station would be awful, but every now and then there might be one good enough to see past it.
You say we are not talking about a sulking international, well I don't know about sulking but he is an international. I thought he signed a pro contract with Chelsea to keep other clubs away last January?