You've not watched much football then? Allow me to explain. Player trots over towards corner-taker. Pulls defender with him. Corner-taker then has option of short or long corner. At no point does team voluntarily reduce itself to ten men. Simple enough for you?
I was thinking exactly that when the camera panned to Trossard and March. Leo placed the ball and signalled to the players in the box. Whilst Solly waited just off camera.
hmmmmm great subterfuge!
You've not watched much football then? Allow me to explain. Player trots over towards corner-taker. Pulls defender with him. Corner-taker then has option of short or long corner. At no point does team voluntarily reduce itself to ten men. Simple enough for you?
What's that all about then? definitely looks like something new off the training ground, but I can't really see how it creates any confusion or gives us an advantage. Just seems like a waste of a man to me
just get it in the box ffs!
Somehow I seem to remember seeing this conversation somewhere before. Hmmm ..... might have been on NSC?
Why?
Every corner you can see, without doubt, who will take it, so why do we do it?
Having played around 700+ matches, yes, I'm a old boy, once you've worked out the zone or person you're marking, then in swinger or out swinger makes very little difference.
Am I really missing something here, it just seems like the sort of drill your Level 1 coach brings back from the latest FA Course, which you all do for a few games before you question it's validity.
The Asda in Gloucester is frickin huge! It makes Asda Hollingbury look like a corner shop. Not even USA supermarkets are that big.
I guarantee you with 110% certainty that every single coach & analyst in the Premier League scout set pieces and if they are generally swinging in or out and make major or minor adjustments based on that information.
If the "two corner takers" thing is good or not is a different question - some think it is efficient, some think its not. But in-swinging and out-swinging is seen as relevant information by every single coach on that level, I promise you that. The answer to your "am I missing something here" is "yes, the last 30 years".
Without respect, complete b********, once you can see who is taking the bloody corner you apply the drill. As the ball comes across it isn't a complete bloody surprise how it's getting there.
I may have missed this in what is becoming a hugely long thread, by why are so many people getting so heated up by two people behind the ball for a corner, but don't raise so much as an eyebrow when the same thing happens 10 yards outside and to the side of the penalty box for a free kick?
Surely it's the same psychology / doubt / deception at play? It might swing in, it might swing out?
I know it’s a long thread but everything you have asked has been discussed.
I’m not sure ‘so many ‘ people are getting heated up ( go to the political threads for this ) it’s just a discussion about corners.
As mentioned we had at least 8 corners against Fulham, in your honest opinion did any of these corners look impressive?
Also they all looked pretty much the same last night, with no end result. We did change to Gross taking them, but also mentioned in recent posts, MacAllister looked good taking corners on Saturday but didn’t take one against Fulham.
With so many corners, I did think maybe they will try a short one this time.....we did score from this against West Ham.
Free kicks- 2 or even more players have been lining up behind the ball since year dot, we are used to seeing this.
Thanks for the info - I have dipped in and out of the thread, but clearly missed that these points had been discussed - my apologies.
And I try really hard to stay a long, long way away from the political threads