vegster
Sanity Clause
- May 5, 2008
- 28,272
I think the result of that will simply be a war of words. One side saying the pathologist told them what they wanted to hear, the other saying that the state coroner was biased against them.
All we know is that he wouldn't be dead if they hadn't held him down like that.
Yet strangely, the first autopsy did not employ that logic.
Last edited: