Still waiting for a Trumper to articulately debunk this. Anyone?
hahahahahahaha
Still waiting for a Trumper to articulately debunk this. Anyone?
hahahahahahaha
You really don't know how wrong you are. As I say, your time will pass as the crowd learns to manage the noise you make out.
Change is very often a bad thing.
Still waiting for a Trumper to articulately debunk this. Anyone?
He's gone, and it's simply a matter of time, right? If wrong, please explain.
Why bother? Trump was going to be impeached within a month of taking office because of Russians, Then Trump was going to be impeached beauce of being mentally unfit, then Trump was going to be impeached after Comey's testimony. Its going to debunk itself.
Meanwhile Hillary's smashed up server has been seized and investigations are beginning into various Democrats..
Please respond to the article, not something totally unconnected. Which scenario plays out?
Claiming someone is wrong doesn't make it so, evidence does and you have none.
True. Question anything and you're an unpatriotic, lefty/liberal, moaning doom monger who wants the country to fail.
I'm sure I've heard that somewhere else too.....
Wouldn't it be wonderful if those political stances could come to the middle and actually discuss stuff and get the world sorted.
I guess it's good to be seen doing something.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...t-accept-or-allow-transgender-people-to-serve
I guess it's good to be seen doing something.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...t-accept-or-allow-transgender-people-to-serve
Evidence. If only it was something of which you took notice.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So Scaramucci has accused, on twitter, the Chief of Staff of committing a felony for 'leaking' his financial disclosure, even though it's a public document. He then deleted the tweet.
Incredible and totally shambolic.
Is it deleted? Still news on Brietbart, I was just reading it.
The WH has serious problems with the Deep State leaking etc, this guy was brought in to get tough and has already sacked 3 WH comms staff, this just seams the next step..
www.breitbart.com/big-government/20...ing-felony-leak-of-financial-disclosure-form/
Go ahead and show me some, maybe start with Russian electoral interference? Take as long as you like.
You do know that there is a rather significant investigation ongoing in the USA about this don't you?
You do know that special counsel is investigating and that during the course of investigations Trump's campaign chairman and son-in-law have been forced to admit that meetings with Russian officials did take place? You that is now on record don't you?
Furthermore, these meetings were described as efforts to influence the election and that was shared with Donald Trump Jr. Notes from the meeting have been handed to the special counsel.
So, we have 3 of the closest men to Trump either attending a meeting or being told that the meeting was offering to influence the outcome.
We are either supposed to believe that a) they did not share this information with Trump and that Trump was in sole charge of his election campaign and that these other men had no influence, or b) they felt that the content was of little interest, but this begs the question as to why they felt compelled to inform Donald Trump Jr.
Going further, one wonders why these US patriots did not immediately inform the powers that be that they had been approached by Russian representatives. Why not make such move immediately apparent?
These are just public disclosures. I doubt the special counsel will be releasing full disclosures anytime soon - if ever given that Trump is now seeking to fire his Attorney General and then probably destabilise the special counsel investigations.
I'll leave it to the experts to share the full evidence in time. But hey, you lot don't believe in experts anymore do you.
I guess it's good to be seen doing something.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...t-accept-or-allow-transgender-people-to-serve
A lot of these points can just come under "that's politics". I could compare a lot of that with the DNC election process and make comparisons but really what is the point? Meeting with someone isn't illegal. Until we get proof that the Russians hacked electoral machines or are found to be destroying voting ballots I'll be keeping the innocent until proven guilty idea that has proven so useful in the past.
I am 100% in agreement with this decision, the suicide rates for ex military in the US is very high and something that is trying to be addressed and is still a huge work in progress. 40% of transgender people have attempted suicide,when you combine the two it creates an absolute hotbed of suicide and mental illness. Instead of using this as an excuse for political point scoring maybe we should all realise that this is another fantastic opportunity to address the taboo of mental illness and suicide rates which are not getting enough attention. I mean it's up to you really, you either use it as an opportunity to improve our world or you use it as an opportunity to point score.