Lyndhurst 14
Well-known member
- Jan 16, 2008
- 5,243
Just finished the 3 part Trump Dynasty documentary on History.
A real highlight was the audio of him calling up local journalists, pretending to be someone who knew the Trumps, and talking about how great Donald was.
You can apply those line items to Trump. The only problem is the candidates running against him are considerably worse. What the f*** has happened to the Democrat Party?
Really? Worse than Trump?
Really? Worse than Trump?
You can apply those line items to Trump. The only problem is the candidates running against him are considerably worse. What the f*** has happened to the Democrat Party?
Really? Worse than Trump?
The only problem is the candidates running against him are considerably worse. What the f*** has happened to the Democrat Party?
Most of my relatives fancy Joe Biden but there is a truly liberal element that really fancys Elizabeth Warren. I would say 5 or 6 candidates are better than Trump for sure.
Joe Biden is losing his marbles so rapidly he is more likely to be in a care home than on the ballot for president. Elizabeth Warren claimed to be a red indian and advanced her career as such; she is either mentally deranged or a liar of the worst kind. Bernie Sanders is so far left he makes Karl Marx look like a moderate. And these are the front runners...
For those of you who have no idea about American politics (and it is a quite apparent that most of you don’t) then check out the next debate on Sept 12 and you’ll see why the alternative is more terrifying.
1956 called, they need you back.
Does American Indian suit you better? She’s the one taking advantage...
Agreed she is the one looking the fool. However, using ‘American Indian’ and ‘Red Indian’ are derogatory labels - would you use the ‘N’ word to describe a black person? Try ‘Native American’ or ‘Indigenous People’.
There's a few candidates that aren't bat shit crazy and quite reasonable people.
The kind of people that understand they need to work with the other party and not appear rabid left to swing voters.
To see how the Dems operate one only has to see how they've treated Tulsi Gabbard through party machinations to shut her out.
She's the perfect candidate to take on Trump being a member of the military, isn't bat shit crazy, speaks well, isn't into shitting on Republican voters and would have appeal to swing voters and moderate Republicans.
Imagine being "considerably worse" than a serial lying sexual predator, criminal and fraudster with possible/likely paedophile tendencies?
Sounds like all of the Democratic party candidates must be mass murderers. Struggling to see how they can be considerably worse otherwise.