[Politics] Trump BLIMP over Westminster

[daveinprague]

It's a great thing if you're honest and consistent.

When you're making more of an effort to protest Trump than you do when a Saudi Royal visits your moral compass is a joke.

What sexual assault claims have been laid against the Saudi King?
Again, you are mistaking the issue. It is not about the office, it is about the prat currently holding it.

 

[Iggle Piggle]

[Tweet]1017689197539463168[/tweet]

30 grand for that? It's completely VILLAGE

 

[Mellotron]

"The Swamp" was the Political swamp. He's done a good job rattling their cages.

That's what the voter base see.

By bringing in far worse swamp creatures.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

I just hope someone goes amongst these serial protesters and interviews them as to WHY they are protesting.

9 times out of 10 they make complete ***** of themselves.

Bizarre statement. Evidence?

 

[W.C.]

Bizarre statement. Evidence?

Oh god don't start him off. Anyway, he can talk, he thinks dank memes are cutting edge.

 

[Nixonator]

What an utter embarassment.

 

[One Love]

You literally have no idea what Clinton was accused of do you? You seem to be indicating Monica was the worst, when there was far worse.

I was merely responding to someone's post that suggested Trump was something new in the Presidents seat, he's not. There's been worse. Bill being one.

Defend him, without reference to what about Clinton, for once.

 

[the right footed denilson]

[Tweet]1017689197539463168[/tweet]

30 grand for that? It's completely VILLAGE

Can't you just get them from those cheap card shops for about £2.99??

 

[schmunk]

Can't you just get them from those cheap card shops for about £2.99??

 

[Two Professors]

Just interviewed some 'protesters' in Birmingham.Two Canadians and a German

 

[Tyrone Biggums]

What sexual assault claims have been laid against the Saudi King?
Again, you are mistaking the issue. It is not about the office, it is about the prat currently holding it.

They stone women to death in Saudi Arabia for adultery. That makes any royal in Saudi Arabia a far FAR bigger **** than Trump or Clinton will ever be.

What part of that can't you grasp?

 

[daveinprague]

They stone women to death in Saudi Arabia for adultery. That makes any royal in Saudi Arabia a far FAR bigger **** than Trump or Clinton will ever be.

What part of that can't you grasp?

Again, you seem to be deliberately avoiding the point. The protest is not about the office, or the state. It is about the individual. What part of that cant you grasp?

 

[Tyrone Biggums]

Again, you seem to be deliberately avoiding the point. The protest is not about the office, or the state. It is about the individual. What part of that cant you graps?

And you're missing the point.

You tell me why more people are protesting Trump than a Saudi Royal?

Keeping in mind Trump isn't responsible for anything like the human rights violations the Saudis are.

Go on, take us intro the mindset of these idiot protesters if you could, truly interested to an insight into their warped mindset.

Trump might be a complete dick head but he's nothing like the Saudis. So why the different responses?

 

[daveinprague]

And you're missing the point.

You tell me why more people are protesting Trump than a Saudi Royal?

Keeping in mind Trump isn't responsible for anything like the human rights violations the Saudis are.

Go on, take us intro the mindset of these idiot protesters if you could, truly interested to an insight into their warped mindset.

Trump might be a complete dick head but he's nothing like the Saudis. So why the different responses?

Because, again, the protest is towards the individual, and not the office.

 

[Tyrone Biggums]

Because, again, the protest is towards the individual, and not the office.

And again, why isn't a Saudi royal whose nation stones women to death more vile and worthy of mass protest than Trump? Are you saying they can't mass protest a singular Saudi royal?

Are the left really that shallow and thick?

 

[daveinprague]

And again, why isn't a Saudi royal whose nation stones women to death more vile and worthy of mass protest than Trump? Are you saying they can't mass protest a singular Saudi royal?

Are the left really that shallow and thick?

In order for an individual to be convicted in a Saudi sharia law court of adultery, he/she must confess to the act four times in front of the court; otherwise four pious male Muslims who witnessed the actual sexual penetration must testify in front of the court. If the witnesses were spying on the defendants or intentionally watched the defendants commit adultery, their uprightness would be called into question and a conviction for adultery would not take place[26] According to the Islamic sharia law, the burden of proof is on the accuser; and if only one of those witnesses retracted his/her testimony then the accused will be acquitted and the remaining witnesses will be prosecuted for perjury Quran 24:4.


but keep trying to deflect attention away from President McPussyGrab.
Thats Clinton, and now the Saudi King. Anymore?

 

[carlzeiss]

In order for an individual to be convicted in a Saudi sharia law court of adultery, he/she must confess to the act four times in front of the court; otherwise four pious male Muslims who witnessed the actual sexual penetration must testify in front of the court. If the witnesses were spying on the defendants or intentionally watched the defendants commit adultery, their uprightness would be called into question and a conviction for adultery would not take place[26] According to the Islamic sharia law, the burden of proof is on the accuser; and if only one of those witnesses retracted his/her testimony then the accused will be acquitted and the remaining witnesses will be prosecuted for perjury Quran 24:4.


but keep trying to deflect attention away from President McPussyGrab.
Thats Clinton, and now the Saudi King. Anymore?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/nov/17/saudiarabia.international

Rape victim sentenced to 200 lashes and six months in jail

A judge in Saudi Arabia has ordered a victim of gang rape to receive 200 lashes - more than double her original sentence for being alone with a man who was not a relative - after she appealed against the lenient sentences given to the men who attacked her. He also jailed her for six months.

The 21-year-old woman, who was 19 at the time of the attack and is known by the Saudi media as "the girl from Qatif", was raped 14 times by a gang of seven. Although her attackers were found guilty and sentenced to between 10 months and five years last year, she was simultaneously sentenced to 90 lashes as punishment for riding in a car with a man who was not a relative.

 

[daveinprague]

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/nov/17/saudiarabia.international

Rape victim sentenced to 200 lashes and six months in jail

A judge in Saudi Arabia has ordered a victim of gang rape to receive 200 lashes - more than double her original sentence for being alone with a man who was not a relative - after she appealed against the lenient sentences given to the men who attacked her. He also jailed her for six months.

The 21-year-old woman, who was 19 at the time of the attack and is known by the Saudi media as "the girl from Qatif", was raped 14 times by a gang of seven. Although her attackers were found guilty and sentenced to between 10 months and five years last year, she was simultaneously sentenced to 90 lashes as punishment for riding in a car with a man who was not a relative.

Was it the King?

 

[schmunk]

Was it the King?

No - the King prevented the punishment from being enforced: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatif_rape_case

 

[Tyrone Biggums]

In order for an individual to be convicted in a Saudi sharia law court of adultery, he/she must confess to the act four times in front of the court; otherwise four pious male Muslims who witnessed the actual sexual penetration must testify in front of the court. If the witnesses were spying on the defendants or intentionally watched the defendants commit adultery, their uprightness would be called into question and a conviction for adultery would not take place[26] According to the Islamic sharia law, the burden of proof is on the accuser; and if only one of those witnesses retracted his/her testimony then the accused will be acquitted and the remaining witnesses will be prosecuted for perjury Quran 24:4.

What are you trying to say? That it doesn't happen?

but keep trying to deflect attention away from President McPussyGrab.
Thats Clinton, and now the Saudi King. Anymore?

I'm not deflecting his action, I'm highlighting people that are hypocritical and love a good double standard.