It was.Wasn't it Trossard who slipped then recovered to get his cross in?
It was.Wasn't it Trossard who slipped then recovered to get his cross in?
He kind of sums us up. Good player. Neat, skilful, pleasing on the eye. Lacks power and pace. Doesn’t score or assist enough though for an attacking player, just no cutting edge.
So: two assists and an incorrectly ruled out goal = anonymous.
Wasn't it Trossard who slipped then recovered to get his cross in?
And the other 85 minutes?
One bit of luck
One dead ball
One debatable foul
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Plus he’s always had those big black rings under his eyes and looked knackered. Maybe he’s just not happy right now. We’re in a pandemic and they’re away from family - who knows what’s going on?
Whichever it was, it was fortuitous and gave him time that he rarely gets. I can’t honestly Isay I would have been confident of him delivering without it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you can't bring yourself to praise the bloke for slipping, recovering quickly andgetting in a brilliant cross from which we scored, you'll never see any good in him.
Trossard is a good player who had a bad game on a shocking pitch.
This is when you realise that a lot of Brighton fans would rather have 11 cloggers on the pitch.
The sooner we get a big man upfront and start hoofing it to him, like they did when pitches were like last night, the better for them.
He contributed throughout.
It wasn't luck
Decent dead balls warrant recognition
Most commentators were of the view that it was a foul. An excellent breakaway goal, something we've not exactly excelled at of late. We need more of them. Trossard showed others how to do it.
Watched a different game to me then.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Indeed we all now know you watch the game, reverse what you see to create your miserable negative narrative, then post it on NSC. Good fan.